Teams

Highland - Mattox

2023 B'ham Spring - 40 & Over Weeknight: 1S, 3D · 3.5 Women Tuesday Night

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Tuesday Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Melanie Frusterio
published
3.31
Jill Harris
published
3.23
Leigh Howard
published
3.23
Charlyne Mattox
published 3.5
3.22
Kelley Jones
published
3.15
Jennifer Causey
published
3.07
Susan Vines
published
3.03
Michelle Segrest
published
2.84
Kim Lepley
published
2.80
Paige Goldman
published
Ingrid Straeter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Howard + Jill Harris4150% games+8.5% vs expected
Michelle Segrest + Kelley Jones3253% games+6.4% vs expected
Jennifer Causey + Jill Harris6656% games+0.5% vs expected
Leigh Howard + Jennifer Causey1445% games−2.7% vs expected
Leigh Howard + Kelley Jones123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Frusterio
58W–39L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Jill Harris
35W–29L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Leigh Howard
40W–44L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Charlyne Mattox
20W–21L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Kelley Jones
16W–33L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Jennifer Causey
21W–26L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
Susan Vines
9W–27L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.07
Michelle Segrest
85W–64L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.03
Kim Lepley
5W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
2.84
Paige Goldman
21W–50L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
Ingrid Straeter
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.