Teams

CC-Monarch Thompson Mixed 7.0

2023 CC MXD DOUBLES 40 & OVER · CC USTA MXD 7.0 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-08-12vs CC-LLW-Los Osos HostetterLost 01
L#2 DoublesLon Magaro / Cindy Kullman vs Annette Adamski / William Saiki3-6, 3-6
2023-07-09vs CC-LLW-Los Osos HostetterLost 01
L#1 DoublesCindy Kullman / Lon Magaro vs Kristin Bridgeford / David Gibson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC USTA MXD 7.0 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Cindy Kullman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.33
Cathy Robeck
published 3.5
3.26
Colleen Thompson
published 3.5
Dave Thompson
published 3.5
3.02
Russell Harper
published
2.96
Heather Harper
published 3
John Reeve
published
Lon Magaro
published
Melanie Sundstrom
published
Rachel Janai
published
Stacie Reeve
published
Theresa Young
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Kullman
30W–23L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Cathy Robeck
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Colleen Thompson
29W–26L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Dave Thompson
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Russell Harper
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Heather Harper
23W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.96
John Reeve
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lon Magaro
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melanie Sundstrom
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachel Janai
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stacie Reeve
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Theresa Young
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.