Teams

YMCA:Pagliuca:Pagliuca

2024 NH Adult 18 & Over Men · 3.0 Men 1

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-16vs MTS:BurakLost 03
L#1 DoublesNicholas Brunet / Tom Neal vs Mario Bartoli / Matthew Zanderigo4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesOgnjen Isakovic vs Stuart Scott6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaul R Beauchesne / Paul M Beauchesne vs Ben Bailey / Tim Geist3-6, 2-6
2024-03-02vs MTS:BurakLost 02
L#1 DoublesThomas Muttitt / Tom Neal vs Jayson Burak / Matthew Zanderigo2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDan Gagnon vs Tushar Shrestha3-6, 2-6
2024-02-17vs MTS:BurakWon 30
W#1 DoublesRajesh Manoharan / Landon Comeau vs Ben Bailey / Jayson Burak6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesOgnjen Isakovic vs Tushar Shrestha6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDan Gagnon / William Mortimer vs Brian Zikaras / Mingliang Ge6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2024-02-03vs MTS:BurakLost 03
L#1 DoublesDouglas Laidlaw / Nicholas Brunet vs Stuart Scott / Matthew Zanderigo5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesWilliam Mortimer vs Mingliang Ge5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaul R Beauchesne / Paul M Beauchesne vs Michael Carter / Tim Geist4-6, 2-6
2024-01-20vs MTS:BurakLost 03
L#1 DoublesLandon Comeau / Dan Gagnon vs Stuart Scott / Matthew Zanderigo4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRajesh Manoharan vs Jim Morris3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaul R Beauchesne / Leo Talbot vs Ben Bailey / Barry Fougere2-6, 0-6
2024-01-06vs MTS:BurakWon 21
W#1 DoublesDouglas Laidlaw / Rajesh Manoharan vs Matthew Zanderigo / Brian Zikaras6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesChristopher Pericak vs Stuart Scott0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesNicholas Brunet / Mike Pagliuca vs Barry Fougere / Michael Carter4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Rajesh Manoharan
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.28
Douglas Laidlaw
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.83
Dan Gagnon
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Nicholas Brunet
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Thomas Muttitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Tom Neal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Mike Pagliuca
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Marge Pagliuca
published
Christopher Pericak
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Landon Comeau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Leo Talbot
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ognjen Isakovic
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Paul M Beauchesne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Paul R Beauchesne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
William Mortimer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rajesh Manoharan + Douglas Laidlaw9357% games+7.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rajesh Manoharan
48W–50L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
Douglas Laidlaw
35W–34L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3
Dan Gagnon
10W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Nicholas Brunet
11W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Thomas Muttitt
24W–30L career · 1 line in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Tom Neal
2W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.61
Mike Pagliuca
8W–40L career · 1 line in 2024
47%53%<1%
2.51
Marge Pagliuca
55W–105L career · no lines in 2024
0%94%6%
2.28
Christopher Pericak
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Landon Comeau
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Leo Talbot
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Ognjen Isakovic
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paul M Beauchesne
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paul R Beauchesne
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
William Mortimer
8W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.