Teams

DAVIE STADIUM 40MX6.0B

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX6.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-07-06vs DAVIE STADIUM 40MX6.0CLost 12
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Frost / Carolyn Carlstroem vs Charlotte Niel / Bob Koury4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesArthur Liu / Patti Olson vs Maria Debenedetti / Nick Halatsis6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAdriano Bravo / Sharon Lebenkoff vs Grace Man / Christopher Pagel3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40&Over MX6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Benjamin Frost
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Patrick Marchwiak
published
3.30
Duncan Watson
published 3.5
2.91
Arthur Liu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Kirill Mazin
published
2.79
Adriano Bravo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Borivoje Nikolic
published 3
2.75
Becky Bremser
published 3
2.73
Patti Olson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
2.63
Carolyn Whittle
published 3
2.55
Paul Carlstroem
published
2.48
Cindy Reid
published 3
2.41
Carolyn Carlstroem
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Paul Lecky
published
Sharon Lebenkoff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Carlstroem + Paul Carlstroem033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Benjamin Frost
8W–8L career · type D · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
Patrick Marchwiak
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Duncan Watson
4W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Enrique Henestroza Anguiano
3W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Arthur Liu
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Kirill Mazin
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Adriano Bravo
11W–16L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Borivoje Nikolic
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Becky Bremser
2W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Patti Olson
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Jesica Goldhammer-Zebouah
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Carolyn Whittle
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
2.63
Paul Carlstroem
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.55
3
Cindy Reid
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Carolyn Carlstroem
14W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
0%75%25%
2.41
Paul Lecky
15W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Lebenkoff
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.