← Teams

PT&E/SJRC-Newland

2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.8 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Gabriel Newland
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
—
James Wright
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
—
Michael Arellano
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
—
Ranjit Bhaskar
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
—
Wes Haas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.73
Jay Rubin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.43
Joe Entler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Peter Farrelly
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
—
Christopher Bevans
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
—
David Karstad
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2025-03-16Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesGabriel Newland / Jay Rubin vs Michael Jung / Zachary Kinavey4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoe Entler / Christopher Bevans vs Bart Borosky / Steve Eggerts6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJames Wright / Peter Katon vs David Greenberg / Agus Rusli6-1, 6-1
2025-03-08Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesRanjit Bhaskar / James Wright vs Joerg Droste / Vincent Lee6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesPeter Farrelly vs Blair Thompson6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesWes Haas / Peter Katon vs Ahmad Garakani / David Pham6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChristopher Bevans / David Karstad vs Kevin Heller / Ryan Patterson6-4, 6-4
2025-03-02Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesWes Haas / James Wright vs John Polacik / Sheng Saechao6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesPeter Farrelly vs Cristian Crisan6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDavid Karstad / Christopher Bevans vs Brad Johnson / Nick Hooker6-4, 6-2
2025-02-08Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesWes Haas / Gabriel Newland vs Scott Eliason / Tim Luangrath6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Arellano / Ranjit Bhaskar vs Kelly Small / Robert Ferek2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Karstad / Joe Entler vs Bruce Yang / Tony Khamsouk6-4, 6-2
2025-02-01Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesGabriel Newland / James Wright vs Carlin Jackson / Tom Lonergan6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPeter Farrelly / Michael Arellano vs Lance Berkey / Anthony Valenzuela6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRanjit Bhaskar / Peter Katon vs Jonathan Quon / Craig Mills6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-01-25Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesMichael Arellano / Joe Entler vs Derek Carlson / Ruben Garcia-Puga6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesGabriel Newland vs Tony Wang2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPeter Farrelly / Colin Reingold vs Edmund Yuan / Edmundo Arroyo6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWes Haas / James Wright vs James Takahashi / Robert Truong6-3, 6-2
2025-01-11Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesWes Haas / James Wright vs Neil Soiffer / Damon Ogden6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesGabriel Newland vs Patrick Harkin7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJay Rubin / Christopher Bevans vs Zach Butler / Justin Shull6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Karstad / Ranjit Bhaskar vs Tony Moreno / James Horen6-0, 6-1
2025-01-04Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesWes Haas / James Wright vs Christian Walkenhorst / Patrick Brewer6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesPeter Farrelly vs Eric Goldner6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesChristopher Bevans / Colin Reingold vs Ken Avenoso / Nate Look6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRanjit Bhaskar / Joe Entler vs Quanwang Wei / Tod Johnston6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Gabriel Newland
32W–27L career
not enough data
—
4
James Wright
6W–14L career
not enough data
—
4
Michael Arellano
29W–12L career
not enough data
—
4
Ranjit Bhaskar
5W–6L career
not enough data
—
4
Wes Haas
42W–29L career
not enough data
—
4
Jay Rubin
16W–15L career
3%96%1%
3.73
3.5
Joe Entler
28W–42L career
0%89%11%
3.43
3.5
Peter Farrelly
42W–55L career
0%97%3%
3.34
3.5
Christopher Bevans
2W–15L career
not enough data
—
3.5
David Karstad
0W–7L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.