Teams

Just For Fun

2022 Ekolu League · 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 2.88 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-30vs Kimi's 6.0Lost 02
L#1 Female DoublesDebra Tatsuno / Robyn Ishida vs Nina Sabahi / Michele Lefebvre3-6, 0-6
L#1 Male DoublesTravis Haspe / Kelvin Nishiura vs Lance Niimi / Trang Trang1-6, 3-6
2022-10-29vs Tennis PotatoesLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesDebra Tatsuno / Megan Pascual vs Sherlyn Aronce / Erin Kihara0-6, 1-6
2022-10-08vs Kimi's 6.0Lost 02
L#1 Female DoublesMegan Pascual / Debra Tatsuno vs Michele Lefebvre / Nina Sabahi2-6, 2-6
L#1 Male DoublesKelvin Nishiura / Travis Haspe vs Lance Niimi / Trang Trang0-6, 3-6
2022-09-25vs VoltLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesDebra Tatsuno / Robyn Ishida vs Toni Sakai-Kawada / Niko Gagne7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2022-08-21vs VoltLost 01
L#1 Male DoublesKelvin Nishiura / Travis Haspe vs Marlon Cabalar / John Requelman3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tennis Potatoes8022211157
2Volt53141025209
3Kimi's 6.044111331226
4Try Get'm In2681637230
5Just For Fun1751940249

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Lance Kaneshiro
published
2.93
Midori Matsuo
published
2.87
Robyn Ishida
published
2.80
Debra Tatsuno
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Jeremy Butterfield
published
2.56
Jace Taka
published 3
2.55
Kelvin Nishiura
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Jenna Honda
published
2.30
Megan Pascual
published
2.16
Jane Iida
published 2.5
Jo Ann Ishida
published
Raymond Hasegawa
published
Travis Haspe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jo Ann Ishida + Debra Tatsuno5253% gamesnot enough data
Kelvin Nishiura + Lance Kaneshiro213 matchesnot enough data
Debra Tatsuno + Jane Iida123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lance Kaneshiro
59W–54L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Midori Matsuo
32W–12L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
2.93
Robyn Ishida
32W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Debra Tatsuno
55W–59L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Jeremy Butterfield
11W–30L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Jace Taka
12W–25L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Kelvin Nishiura
50W–162L career · 7 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
2.55
Jenna Honda
9W–39L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
2.51
Megan Pascual
20W–38L career · no lines in 2022
0%94%6%
2.30
2.5
Jane Iida
35W–62L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Jo Ann Ishida
49W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Raymond Hasegawa
14W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Travis Haspe
7W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.