Teams

PC-Down the T

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-03-20vs YTC-YakimaniacsWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily McNabb / Erica Bjella vs Molly Neal / Jennifer Terami6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMargaret Murgor vs Erika Mullins6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTiffany Hebdon / Susan Duncan vs Diane Hehir / Judi Harris6-7, 3-6
2022-03-19vs YTC-YakimaniacsWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily McNabb / Erica Bjella vs Michelle Russell / Dana Lybeck6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTiffany Hebdon vs Molly Neal6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBECKY MAGNUSON / Susan Duncan vs Judi Harris / Diane Hehir2-6, 2-6
2022-03-19vs YTC-YakimaniacsLost 12
L#1 DoublesTiffany Hebdon / Mauri Morgan vs Rose Longoria / Molly Neal7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTina Duncan vs Michelle Russell3-1
W#2 DoublesBECKY MAGNUSON / Margaret Murgor vs Dana Lybeck / Erika Mullins2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-03-18vs YTC-YakimaniacsLost 12
L#1 DoublesTina Duncan / Susan Duncan vs Judi Harris / Dana Lybeck2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMauri Morgan vs Jennifer Terami3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBECKY MAGNUSON / Tiffany Hebdon vs Rose Longoria / Diane Hehir6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 2.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PC-Down the T226613100

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Michael Khounnala
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.87
Erica Bjella
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Emily McNabb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Mauri Morgan
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.94
Tina Duncan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.81
Tiffany Hebdon
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
BECKY MAGNUSON
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Margaret Murgor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily McNabb + Erica Bjella33766% games+10.7% vs expected
Mauri Morgan + Tina Duncan11262% games+7.2% vs expected
Tiffany Hebdon + Tina Duncan314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michael Khounnala
47W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4
Erica Bjella
58W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
3.5
Emily McNabb
61W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%22%78%
3.60
3
Mauri Morgan
39W–28L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Tina Duncan
48W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
2.94
Tiffany Hebdon
23W–5L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
BECKY MAGNUSON
4W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.48
Margaret Murgor
4W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.