Teams

Champion

2025 CVTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring · Women 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-04vs KerceWon 32
L#1 DoublesKaren Russell / Heather Ellington vs Kerrigan LeBoeuf / Sarah Arthur6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKay Henderson vs Urooj Wali3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDenise Smith / Martha Millican vs Monica Parker / April Chastain6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesBetsy Shepherd vs Candace Mason7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBreana Morris / Dana Kubow vs Catrina Mashburn / Pam Mills6-2, 7-5
2025-02-25vs ChapmanWon 41
L#1 DoublesMartha Millican / Betsy Shepherd vs Karlene Welty / Brittany Carroll5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKay Henderson vs Rachel Ragland6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Russell / Heather Ellington vs Regina Drummond / Kristie Teasley6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCindy Rivers McGraw vs Jennifer Kingsley6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDarlene Powell / Denise Smith vs Vivian White / Lori Patch6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Betsy Shepherd
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Heather Ellington
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Kay Henderson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.79
Breana Morris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Darlene Powell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Cassie Brown
published 3
2.73
Cindy Rivers McGraw
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.67
Dana Kubow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Teresa Coone
published
2.60
Martha Millican
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jan Lamier
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betsy Shepherd + Dana Kubow123 matchesnot enough data
Dana Kubow + Kay Henderson213 matchesnot enough data
Dana Kubow + Breana Morris213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Betsy Shepherd
37W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Heather Ellington
35W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Kay Henderson
31W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Breana Morris
31W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Darlene Powell
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.77
3
Cassie Brown
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cindy Rivers McGraw
8W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Dana Kubow
29W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Teresa Coone
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Martha Millican
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
2.60
Jan Lamier
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.