← Teams

SHC-Wendling/Berends

2022 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Bruce Trubo
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
—
Steven Garlock
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Paula Watt
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Bert Berends
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Dan Wendling
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.75
Jim George
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
Kathleen Francis
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
—
Les Wellman
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-05-15Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesBruce Trubo / Betty Trubo vs Kim Hamlik / Jim Hamlik6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLes Wellman / Mary Beth Thomsen vs Lorna Goth / Andy LaFrazia7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBert Berends / Kathleen Francis vs Kelley Gaylor / Dean Gaylor6-1, 6-0
2022-05-07Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesLes Wellman / Mary Beth Thomsen vs Steve Sanford / Kerry Sanford6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSteven Garlock / Paula Watt vs Jerry Garland / Cheryl Roloff7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBert Berends / Kathleen Francis vs Clay Funkhouser / Jan Funkhouser6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-30Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesBruce Trubo / Betty Trubo vs Bill Rhoades / Jennifer Trank6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLes Wellman / Pat Berends vs Mike Baker / Rhonda Baker6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSteven Garlock / Janice Thomas vs Michael Siebers / Kathy Siebers6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-22Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesBruce Trubo / Paula Watt vs Gerald Chase / Joann Donahue7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLes Wellman / Mary Beth Thomsen vs Rand Zoborowski / Lori Zoborowski6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPat Berends / Bert Berends vs Kristi Tompkins / Robert Broad6-3, 6-2
2022-04-15Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLes Wellman / Mary Beth Thomsen vs Nicolle Lochner / Alan Peters7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBert Berends / Kathleen Francis vs Matthew Casimo / Christian Buchholz6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSteven Garlock / Paula Watt vs Patries Ferguson / Kip Stevenson6-3, 6-0
2022-04-09Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJanice Thomas / Les Wellman vs Christine Taylor / Tony Moreno7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBetty Trubo / Bruce Trubo vs Stacy Naccachian / John Harris2-2
L#3 DoublesBernadette Widolff / Dan Wendling vs Karen Groenweghe / Jeffrey Taylor7-6, 6-0
2022-04-02Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesBruce Trubo / Betty Trubo vs Steve Sanford / Kathy Briscoe6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDan Wendling / Bernadette Widolff vs Jerry Garland / Cheryl Roloff7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJim George / Kathleen Francis vs Sharon Reese / Abbas Mottaghi1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-03-27Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesDan Wendling / Bernadette Widolff vs Murray Jansen / Dayna Porter6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLes Wellman / Mary Beth Thomsen vs Kirk Planck / Megan Clifford7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJim George / Kathleen Francis vs Michael Jansen / Catherine Greenblatt6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Bruce Trubo
24W–7L career · type M
not enough data
—
3.5
Steven Garlock
16W–21L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Paula Watt
43W–47L career
15%82%2%
3.17
3.5
Bert Berends
14W–37L career
23%76%0%
3.09
3.5
Dan Wendling
52W–43L career
39%61%0%
2.99
3
Jim George
30W–21L career
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Kathleen Francis
16W–12L career
not enough data
—
3
Les Wellman
43W–42L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.