Teams

9-CGonzales-ENO

2024 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-30vs 7-APerry-ENOWon 10
W#2 DoublesCecilia Gonzales / Ragini Singh vs Ashley Perry / Anna Jessup6-0, 6-0
2024-09-23vs 5-NDolan-HRWon 10
W#1 DoublesAreli Grodski / Kari Lovetinsky vs Dana Powers / Lissa Gotwals6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-09-22vs 6-DBaker-ENOLost 01
L#3 DoublesEmily Ryan / Areli Grodski vs Susanne Schmal / Debbie Baker5-7, 1-6
2024-09-09vs 4-LDubois-ENOLost 03
L#1 DoublesChelsea Donahue / Cecilia Gonzales vs Kelly Conklin / Laura Dubois1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnais Rios / Areli Grodski vs Caroline Perkinson / Liz Schaller4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKari Lovetinsky / Xian Zhang vs Hayley Blum / Laura Cannon1-6, 3-6
2024-08-26vs 1-SStowe-SVCWon 10
W#2 DoublesRagini Singh / Krissy Dunn vs Jennifer Magee / Elizabeth Arnold7-5, 7-5
2024-08-19vs 2-JFaubert-ENOLost 01
L#2 DoublesKari Lovetinsky / Jennifer Dunlap vs Loralie Bible / Kristy Clare3-6, 4-6
2024-08-12vs 8-ADavies-CHCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnais Rios / Cecilia Gonzales vs Leslie Fernandez / Joanna Hooten1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKari Lovetinsky / Jennifer Dunlap vs Tracy Davies / Julie Myers6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesChelsea Donahue / Areli Grodski vs Jennifer Braby / Lauren Derrenbacher6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Ragini Singh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Jennifer Dunlap
published
2.81
Kari Lovetinsky
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
Anais Rios
published 3
Chelsea Donahue
published 3
2.69
Cecilia Gonzales
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Katie Helms
published
2.53
Areli Grodski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.52
Krissy Dunn
published
Korinne Fuller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Helms + Areli Grodski213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ragini Singh
95W–47L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.41
Jennifer Dunlap
25W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Kari Lovetinsky
116W–121L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Anais Rios
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Chelsea Donahue
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Cecilia Gonzales
49W–89L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
Katie Helms
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
0%11%89%
2.66
2.5
Areli Grodski
45W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%40%60%
2.53
Krissy Dunn
10W–16L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
2.52
Korinne Fuller
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.