Teams

LCTA18/Cladakis/MPR

2022 LCTA 18 & Over Fall League · 18 & over Fall League Men 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-14vs LCTA18/Honigman/MaybankWon 20
W#1 DoublesMike Cladakis / Nick Cladakis vs Thomas Hollowell / Benton Weinacker1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBert Gierhart / Carter Rowson vs Bradley Gaber / Sean Edge6-2, 7-5
2024-07-31vs LCTA18/Sullivan/Doty ParkLost 02
L#1 DoublesClaudio Carrara / Wilson Crouch vs Sean McCawley / Nick Suger2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMike Cladakis / Benjy Cooke vs Eric Epstein / Josh Sullivan6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2023-03-23vs LCTA18/Gaul/MPRWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Hauser / Michael Carroll vs Joseph Gaul / Frank Pettersen6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesBert Gierhart vs Ken Edwards2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMike Cladakis / Claudio Carrara vs James Picha / Tom Mallon6-1, 7-5
2023-02-09vs LCTA18/Gaul/MPRSplit 11
L#1 SinglesScott Kelly vs Kirk Watari6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesClaudio Carrara / Michael Hauser vs Tom Cunneff / James Picha6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & over Fall League Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Claudio Carrara
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Michael Hauser
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Mike Cladakis
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Bert Gierhart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.38
Shane Farrell
published
Greg Yancey
published
Scott Kelly
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Hauser + Claudio Carrara7066% games+4.5% vs expected
Claudio Carrara + Bert Gierhart6355% games+1.3% vs expected
Michael Hauser + Bert Gierhart4257% games−3.1% vs expected
Michael Hauser + Mike Cladakis224 matchesnot enough data
Greg Yancey + Michael Hauser303 matchesnot enough data
Mike Cladakis + Bert Gierhart213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Claudio Carrara
103W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
Michael Hauser
134W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Mike Cladakis
42W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Bert Gierhart
43W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Shane Farrell
34W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
Greg Yancey
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Kelly
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.