← Teams

STAC-Davis

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Huong Lakin
published 4.5
—
Lisa Gray
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 4.5
4.17
Monique Eldridge
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.10
Colleen Sharkey
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.09
Chanel Nielsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
—
Theresa Helland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 0
Results16 ties
2021-06-27Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesReva Wallace / Chanel Nielsen vs Melisa Biscayno / Jenifer Diegel6-2, 5-4
2021-06-26Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesSally Harn / Theresa Helland vs Rene Ketchum / Patty Kilmer6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChanel Nielsen / Lisa Gray vs Andrea Lipper / Kathy Hunter6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTami Davis / Colleen Sharkey vs Joanne Sposito / Brenda Williams6-0, 6-0
2021-06-19Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesReva Wallace / Chanel Nielsen vs Priscilla McAughan / Laurie Ono7-6, 6-4
2021-06-06Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesTami Davis / Monique Eldridge vs Kim Hood / Debbie Short6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChanel Nielsen / Lisa Gray vs Sachiko Ishihara-Spray / Natalia Devore4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSally Harn / Colleen Sharkey vs Terra Yara / Shana Curran7-5, 7-5
2021-06-06Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesChanel Nielsen / Reva Wallace vs Molly Canada / Natalia Devore6-4, 7-5
2021-06-05Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesChanel Nielsen / Lisa Gray vs Susanne Neupauer / Hana Farr6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesColleen Sharkey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTami Davis / Monique Eldridge vs Dinah Satterwhite / Kim Hedger6-4, 6-3
2021-05-23Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesMonique Eldridge / Tami Davis vs Dinah Satterwhite / Lyna Nguyen6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesChanel Nielsen vs Sarah Footh6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesReva Wallace / Colleen Sharkey vs Liana Hunsaker / Tonya Schmid6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesApril Gentry / Theresa Helland vs Hana Farr / Susanne Neupauer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-22Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesIngrid Bakke / Lisa Gray vs Haley Zeylmaker / Sarah Johnston6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesApril Gentry / Theresa Helland vs Marina Cheng / Tenley Cederstrand6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChanel Nielsen / Tami Davis vs Cathy Healy / Penny Woodruff6-0, 6-0
2021-05-16Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesChanel Nielsen / Reva Wallace vs Caroline Truong / Maryse Sparks6-7, 6-2
2021-05-09Won 3–1
L#1 DoublesReva Wallace / Lisa Gray vs Joanne Sposito / Rene Ketchum4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSally Harn / Theresa Helland vs Patty Kilmer / Melanie Redding6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesColleen Sharkey vs Angela Keck6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChanel Nielsen / Paula Moll vs Andrea Lipper / Kathy Hunter6-2, 6-4
2021-05-08Won 1–0
W#2 SinglesColleen Sharkey vs Elise Anderson6-2, 6-3
2021-04-18Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesMonique Eldridge / Jodi Landefeld vs Jill Spaulding / Sierra Wright6-3, 6-4
2021-04-17Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesMonique Eldridge / Randi Welch vs Caitlin Hicks / Elaine Kelley6-4, 6-3
2021-04-10Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesLisa Gray / Amanda Solomon vs Xia Wu / Sue Gregoire7-5, 6-1
2021-04-09Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesColleen Sharkey / Sierra Wright vs Tara Heikila / Heidi Affentranger6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmanda Solomon / Lisa Gray vs Jackie Dooris / Tonya Dirk7-6, 6-2
2021-04-02Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesAmanda Solomon / Lisa Gray vs Corinne Celko / Lisa Volle6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Huong Lakin
11W–3L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Lisa Gray
90W–56L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Monique Eldridge
102W–56L career
2%98%1%
4.17
4.5
Colleen Sharkey
65W–49L career
2%98%0%
4.10
4.5
Chanel Nielsen
244W–118L career
3%97%0%
4.09
0
Theresa Helland
78W–34L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.