Teams

UPTA55C/Gruendling/Cardinal

2025 UPTA Combo 55 & Over - SC · 55+ Combo Women - 6.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-27vs UPTA55C/Simollardes/Keowee KeyWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Suski / Catherine Murry vs CRYSTAL BLIDE / Tish Fontana6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChimene Evans / Katherine Robinson vs Liz Turnure / Leslie Colomb6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDenise Malone / Robin Zeigler vs Adrianne Brandecker / Eileen Simollardes6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesCatherine Murry / Vicki Dixon vs Susan McClure / Katie Saad3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChimene Evans / Denise Malone vs Bessie Gonzalez / Susan Tankersley6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSandi Tolly / Kyra Roberts vs Caroline Warthen / Jennifer Smith6-3, 6-2
2025-07-30vs UPTA55C/Cain/Spindle TreeWon 21
L#1 DoublesChimene Evans / Denise Malone vs Sherry Gibson / Cynthia Wood5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTari Dygert / Kyra Roberts vs Meg Sheffield / Susan Jennings6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCynthia Forbes / Sandi Tolly vs Sherry Koban / Carol Reifenberger6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55+ Combo Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Tari Dygert
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.29
Denise Malone
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Cornelia Buch
published 3.5
3.21
Vicki Dixon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Sandi Tolly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Rebecca Gruendling
published
3.11
Cynthia Forbes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Lorri Laufenberg
published
3.07
Katherine Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Beth Timmons
published 3.5
2.99
Kyra Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Chimene Evans
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Catherine Murry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Valerie Mattingly
published
Mary Suski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robin Zeigler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Malone + Katherine Robinson101445% games−6.2% vs expected
Kyra Roberts + Valerie Mattingly0629% gamesnot enough data
Cynthia Forbes + Tari Dygert134 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Murry + Kyra Roberts224 matchesnot enough data
Kyra Roberts + Chimene Evans134 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Forbes + Katherine Robinson033 matchesnot enough data
Lorri Laufenberg + Tari Dygert213 matchesnot enough data
Lorri Laufenberg + Katherine Robinson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tari Dygert
43W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Denise Malone
16W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Cornelia Buch
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vicki Dixon
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
Sandi Tolly
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.19
Rebecca Gruendling
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cynthia Forbes
12W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
Lorri Laufenberg
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10
Katherine Robinson
17W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Beth Timmons
7W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Kyra Roberts
17W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Chimene Evans
21W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Catherine Murry
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Valerie Mattingly
9W–30L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Mary Suski
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robin Zeigler
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.