Teams

Carkeet/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-20vs Witte/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Ferrara / Kim Badger vs Martha Carter / Rachel Montague6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesErin Mullis vs Anna Witte0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Lomax / Whitney Greer vs Laura Weaver / Callie Wesson2-6, 4-6
2024-11-18vs Galdieri/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeigh Lamb / Autumn Peterson vs Emily Craven / Jeanne Cannon6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMary Margaret Posey vs Diana Galdieri2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWhitney Greer / Kim Badger vs Kelly Baker / Doriann Fairchild0-6, 2-6
2024-11-12vs Avant/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Lomax / Erin Mullis vs Krystal Shaw / Katie McDermott1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMary Margaret Posey vs Anna Avant6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWhitney Greer / Autumn Peterson vs Lindsey Myers / Ashley Powers0-6, 0-6
2024-10-30vs Smith/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Margaret Posey / Leigh Lamb vs Rachel Burford / Angela Wood3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLeigh Ann Carkeet vs Carrie Moore2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKim Badger / Whitney Greer vs Amber Caggiano / LaTreka Smith6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-23vs Moore/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Lomax / Autumn Peterson vs Tatiana de la Barrera / Ashley Elder1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRebekah Molnar vs Amy Smith0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesErin Mullis / Jennifer Dye vs Krista York / Catherine Brimhall2-6, 1-6
2024-10-15vs Steinhausler/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesWhitney Greer / Suzanne Lomax vs Tamara Steinhausler / Nancy Chandrasekaran1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMary Margaret Posey vs Lyndsay Gronostaj0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLeigh Ann Carkeet / Jennifer Dye vs Erin Shackelford / Samantha Rohlinger3-6, 2-6
2024-10-02vs Sudduth/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeigh Ann Carkeet / Erin Mullis vs Karen Weissinger / Frannie Franks1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRebekah Molnar vs Mary Marshall Fenton2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLin Fryman / Autumn Peterson vs Janie Beanblossom / Morgan Ray0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.06 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.48
Mary Margaret Posey
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Autumn Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.14
Suzanne Lomax
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.12
Kathy Ferrara
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.01
Kim Badger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.93
Erin Mullis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.88
Whitney Greer
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
1.87
Leigh Ann Carkeet
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Lin Fryman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rebekah Molnar
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Whitney Greer + Mary Margaret Posey2337% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Ferrara + Kim Badger044 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Ferrara + Leigh Ann Carkeet123 matchesnot enough data
Rebekah Molnar + Leigh Ann Carkeet033 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne Lomax + Whitney Greer033 matchesnot enough data
Whitney Greer + Erin Mullis033 matchesnot enough data
Mary Margaret Posey + Autumn Peterson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Margaret Posey
23W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%57%43%
2.48
2.5
Autumn Peterson
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Lomax
12W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Kathy Ferrara
4W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.12
Kim Badger
1W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01
2.5
Erin Mullis
2W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Whitney Greer
3W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.88
Leigh Ann Carkeet
3W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.87
Lin Fryman
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rebekah Molnar
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.