Teams

SGV Dare Doubles-Yeh-WN/SU

2025 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCharles Maroun / David Mayer vs Christopher Li / Dominic Osmena3-6, 6-7
2025-06-22vs SGV Triforces-D.Li-WN/SAWon 10
W#1 DoublesWillie Yeh / David Mayer vs Sergio Ibarra / Trenman Yau4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDavid Mayer / Patrick Rud vs Phillip Lee / Chris Wong6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJason Cheng / Patrick Rud vs William Pence / Ferdinand Fontanilla1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSam Qian vs Simon Kim6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMax Seong Cho vs Nicola Pancotti6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesCary Chee / John Bragg vs Rafael Molina / Juan Guevara4-6, 2-0
L#1 SinglesMax Seong Cho vs Nick Leonard1-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
David Mayer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Sam Qian
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.48
Jesse Rosas
published
3.43
Charles Maroun
published 4
3.42
Willie Yeh
published
3.38
Cary Chee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Max Seong Cho
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.32
John Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
John Bragg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jason Cheng
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Patrick Rud
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Bragg + Cary Chee123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Mayer
106W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
Sam Qian
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
Jesse Rosas
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.48
4
Charles Maroun
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
Willie Yeh
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.42
3.5
Cary Chee
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Max Seong Cho
5W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.35
John Gonzalez
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
John Bragg
24W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.16
Jason Cheng
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patrick Rud
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.