Teams

Chang/Dellinger

2024 · 2025 EVTA USTA MXD 40 & Over - Fall '24

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-18vs EVTA/Phillip EdwardsLost 02
L#2 DoublesJeff Barnes / Sarah Zipfel vs Phillip Edwards / Pamela Cleaver6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLawanna Chang / Todd Williams vs Brett Dutton / Tina Binette2-6, 6-7
2024-11-12vs EVTA/Phillip EdwardsWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeff Barnes / Sarah Zipfel vs Erica Rutledge / Cameron Weigandt6-0, 6-3
2024-11-05vs EVTA/Phillip EdwardsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Zipfel / Todd Williams vs Jenny Eberhard / Brett Dutton2-6, 3-6
2024-10-29vs EVTA/Phillip EdwardsLost 02
L#2 DoublesLawanna Chang / Todd Williams vs Jenny Eberhard / Cameron Weigandt7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeff Barnes / Sarah Zipfel vs Katie Thomas / Peter Novis1-6, 1-6
2024-10-22vs EVTA/Phillip EdwardsLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeff Barnes / Lindsey Langhans vs Brett Dutton / Carol Edwards4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Zipfel / Jacob Bush vs Jenny Eberhard / Timothy Annis2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLawanna Chang / Todd Williams vs Steven Hein / Erica Rutledge7-5, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 EVTA USTA MXD 40 & Over - Fall '24 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Jacob Bush
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Lawanna Chang
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
3.69
Sarah Zipfel
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.66
Carmon Hipp
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.65
Lindsey Langhans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Todd Williams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.43
Raymond Chang
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
3.35
Jeff Barnes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Raymond Chang + Jacob Bush6163% games+22.2% vs expected
Jeff Barnes + Sarah Zipfel2450% gamesnot enough data
Raymond Chang + Todd Williams044 matchesnot enough data
Raymond Chang + Lawanna Chang123 matchesnot enough data
Todd Williams + Lawanna Chang033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jacob Bush
36W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.85
Lawanna Chang
48W–21L career · 11 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
Sarah Zipfel
61W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Carmon Hipp
27W–6L career · 11 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
Lindsey Langhans
16W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
Todd Williams
1W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
Raymond Chang
38W–43L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Jeff Barnes
76W–59L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.