Teams

NJ: Infinity

2026 40&Over Women · 3.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-27vs ALLEY KATSWon 31
L#1 DoublesKaren Jang / Hee Kyung Oak vs Lysa Scarselli / Tara St-Pierre3-6, 3-5
W#1 SinglesJina Huh-Yoo vs Lindsey Pourreza6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMAIKO AMANO / Chikayo Poston vs Maria Ponzio / Criselda Farrell6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSayaka Sung / Suzy Arku-Nyadia vs Silvana Penava / Marisa Carr6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-20vs Dare DoublesWon 30
W#1 DoublesSayaka Sung / Suzy Arku-Nyadia vs Niena Jerdee / Martha Morley6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesHeather Benjamin vs Alison Haag6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJina Huh-Yoo / Hee Kyung Oak vs Dawn Foster / Inna Rozenberg6-1, 6-3
2026-07-06vs ALLEY KATSWon 31
W#1 DoublesMAIKO AMANO / Chikayo Poston vs Jenna Hammond / Silvana Penava2-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKaren Jang vs Lindsey Pourreza6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSharon Jacobson / Adriana Levine vs Marisa Carr / Tara St-Pierre7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTara Gebbia / Karina Sanzari vs Criselda Farrell / Maria Ponzio3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-06-30vs ALLEY KATSSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAdriana Levine / Sayaka Sung - (DQ) vs Patty Leung / Jenna Hammond5-7, 3-5
L#1 SinglesHeather Benjamin vs Lindsey Pourreza6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Jang / Hee Kyung Oak vs Nisha Cordero / Maria Ponzio6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMAIKO AMANO / Chikayo Poston vs Candice Lim / Stephanie Horkan7-5, 6-0
2026-06-29vs Dare DoublesWon 31
L#1 DoublesAdriana Levine / Tara Gebbia vs Martha Morley / Julie Wright6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesHeather Benjamin vs Alison Haag6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMAIKO AMANO / Karina Sanzari vs Danielle Klein / Fran Goldberg6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSharon Jacobson / Sayaka Sung vs Dawn Foster / Stacey Wang6-1, 6-1
2026-06-23vs Dare DoublesWon 30
W#1 DoublesAyumi Lai / Hee Kyung Oak vs Ellen McNamara / Fran Goldberg6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMAIKO AMANO / Christine Young vs Gretchen Horwitz / Stacey Wang6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnna Treece / Mary Anne Carrillo vs Laura Prah / Inna Rozenberg6-4, 6-2
2026-06-15vs ALLEY KATSLost 23
L#1 DoublesMakiko Ishida / Sharon Jacobson vs Maria Ponzio / Carey Neuman6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSuzy Arku-Nyadia vs Jenna Hammond6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMAIKO AMANO / Chikayo Poston vs Marisa Carr / Silvana Penava7-5, 4-5
W#3 DoublesKaren Jang / Sayaka Sung vs Jackie Cunha / Mara Todisco6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesJina Huh-Yoo / Christine Young vs Lisa Sommer-Balog / Candice Lim6-3, 6-3
2026-06-08vs Dare DoublesWon 40
W#1 DoublesMAIKO AMANO / Sharon Jacobson vs Fran Goldberg / Karen Hart6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSayaka Sung / Christine Young vs Katherine Pizzo / Laura Prah6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAyumi Lai / Karina Sanzari vs Barbara Loscalzo / Gretchen Horwitz6-1, 6-1
W#4 DoublesMary Anne Carrillo / Anna Treece vs Fiona Colletta / Dawn Foster6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Chikayo Poston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.07
Karen Jang
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.05
Adriana Levine
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.05
Suzy Arku-Nyadia
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Ayumi Lai
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.03
Sayaka Sung
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.02
Karina Sanzari
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.99
Hee Kyung Oak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
MAIKO AMANO
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.96
Jina Huh-Yoo
usually #4 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.95
Tara Gebbia
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Sharon Jacobson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Mary Anne Carrillo
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Heather Benjamin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.84
Anna Treece
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Makiko Ishida
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Harumi Miles
published
Roseann Todd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jina Huh-Yoo + Tara Gebbia2344% games+6.5% vs expected
MAIKO AMANO + Chikayo Poston4161% games+5.9% vs expected
Adriana Levine + Sayaka Sung213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chikayo Poston
11W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
Karen Jang
9W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.07
3
Adriana Levine
83W–51L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
Suzy Arku-Nyadia
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Ayumi Lai
4W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04
Sayaka Sung
14W–4L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.03
Karina Sanzari
42W–31L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Hee Kyung Oak
13W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
MAIKO AMANO
13W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Jina Huh-Yoo
30W–21L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
2.96
Tara Gebbia
4W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Sharon Jacobson
21W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Mary Anne Carrillo
8W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Heather Benjamin
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
2.91
3
Anna Treece
5W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Makiko Ishida
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Harumi Miles
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Roseann Todd
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.