Teams

LABBE/18/3.5/WD/BREC

2025 City Championship 18 & Over - Women Day · 3.5 (18&O) Women Day

18 players · average NTRP 3.31 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings6 teams · 3.5 (18&O) Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jeansonne/18/3.5/WD/BOC92381741401
2Allain/18/3.5/WD/LEG92381746399
3Sellers/18/3.5/WD/CCLA74352048463
4Kozar/18/3.0/WD/UC74312454448
5LABBE/18/3.5/WD/BREC29173882566
6Temple/18/3.5/WD/BREC110183776521

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Remy Curry
published
Cheryl Brodnax
published 3.5
Cindy Pixley
published 3.5
3.21
Sheila Gordon
published
3.16
Brenda Katzmarzyk
published 3.5
3.15
Corinne Viso
published 3.5
3.11
Suzanne Wortmann
published
3.10
Darilyn Baudoin
published 3.5
2.98
Jennifer Mogenson
published
2.98
Kyle Barker
published
2.87
Amy Slate
published 3
2.86
Donna Mitchell
published 3
2.85
Carole Wilkins
published 3
2.81
Melanie McCall
published
2.79
Terre Smith
published
2.77
Shelly Labbe
published
2.68
Kelly Bauder
published
2.56
Jessica Mcvea
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Mogenson + Terre Smith7362% games+4.2% vs expected
Brenda Katzmarzyk + Sheila Gordon5549% games−3.6% vs expected
Suzanne Wortmann + Corinne Viso2344% games−4.1% vs expected
Suzanne Wortmann + Darilyn Baudoin4645% games−10.8% vs expected
Shelly Labbe + Amy Slate5166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Remy Curry
39W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Cheryl Brodnax
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Cindy Pixley
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheila Gordon
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Brenda Katzmarzyk
12W–17L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Corinne Viso
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Suzanne Wortmann
36W–54L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Darilyn Baudoin
11W–16L career · type A · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10
Jennifer Mogenson
69W–42L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Kyle Barker
18W–55L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Amy Slate
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Donna Mitchell
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Carole Wilkins
27W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
Melanie McCall
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Terre Smith
46W–41L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
Shelly Labbe
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Kelly Bauder
14W–16L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Jessica Mcvea
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.