Teams

Peachtree Station (Bruce Hubbard)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Men - Regular · 3.0 Men (D.C.)

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 SinglesNathan Haynes vs Richard Glover2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBruce Hubbard / HUGH HENDERSON vs Michael Blalock / Nicholas Linder1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesKyle Dabruzzi vs Amit Narayan7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJason Dill / Cyril Mazloum vs Sailesh Makhijani / Vamsi Reddy3-6, 3-6
2024-12-14vs East Roswell (Bret Nelson)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesHUGH HENDERSON / Chris Nowak vs Teddy Ewing / Daniel Barcenilla0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJason Dill / Steve Williams vs Matthew Lynch / Kenyon Rhinehart7-5, 1-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTim Steinwedel / Bob Sprinkle vs Craig Chast / Alec Beuckman1-6, 1-6
2024-11-23vs Cambridge (Eric Shack)*Lost 12
L#2 DoublesHUGH HENDERSON / Bruce Hubbard vs Ryan McGuire / Brian Pendergrass2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesNathan Haynes vs Aleksei Solovev0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Klaskala / Bob Sprinkle vs Murali Sundaramurthy / BINAY TIWARI6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men (D.C.) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Nathan Haynes
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Bob Sprinkle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Cyril Mazloum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.40
Tim Steinwedel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Bruce Hubbard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
HUGH HENDERSON
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jason Dill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kyle Dabruzzi
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Philip Richards
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Steinwedel + Bob Sprinkle123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nathan Haynes
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.77
3
Bob Sprinkle
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cyril Mazloum
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tim Steinwedel
5W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.40
2.5
Bruce Hubbard
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
HUGH HENDERSON
0W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jason Dill
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kyle Dabruzzi
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Philip Richards
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.