Teams

Keaney Smith 18s 3.5W Singles Tues PM

2026 Piedmont Singles 18+ · 3.5 Women Singles

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-14vs Gonzalez 18s 3.5W Singles Tues PMLost 12
W#1 SinglesAlexa Smith vs Kari Eddington6-4, 7-6
L#2 SinglesKatelin Sawicki vs Rachel Bryant1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJill Phelps vs Diana Angeles2-6, 2-6
2026-07-09vs Gonzalez 18s 3.5W Singles Tues PMLost 02
L#1 SinglesAlexa Smith vs Kari Eddington5-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKatelin Sawicki vs Clara Gonzalez Flores3-6, 2-6
2026-06-30vs Gonzalez 18s 3.5W Singles Tues PMSplit 11
W#2 SinglesStephanie Renn vs Clara Gonzalez Flores6-1, 6-4
L#3 SinglesJill Phelps vs Suki Gutierrez5-7, 0-6
2026-06-16vs Gonzalez 18s 3.5W Singles Tues PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesStephanie Renn vs Rachel Bryant2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKatelin Sawicki vs Kari Eddington1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJill Phelps vs Suki Gutierrez2-6, 0-6
2026-06-09vs Gonzalez 18s 3.5W Singles Tues PMLost 12
W#1 SinglesStephanie Renn vs Kari Eddington4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJill Phelps vs Rachel Bryant2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesCatherine Martin vs Suki Gutierrez0-6, 0-6
2026-06-02vs Gonzalez 18s 3.5W Singles Tues PMSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAlexa Smith vs Clara Gonzalez Flores4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKatelin Sawicki vs Diana Angeles0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.5 Women Singles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Gonzalez 18s 3.5W Singles Tues PM80204892
2Augustine 18s 3.5W Singles Tues AM8123411137
3Budler 18s 3.5W Singles Tues AM54131432235
4Driscoll 18s 3.5W Singles Tues AM36111635248
5ACC/Brooks 18s 3.5W Singles Tues AM2772043287
6Keaney Smith 18s 3.5W Singles Tues PM0842042277

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Alexa Smith
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.17
Stephanie Renn
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.94
Catherine Martin
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.68
Jill Phelps
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.56
Katelin Sawicki
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexa Smith
30W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
Stephanie Renn
9W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.17
3
Catherine Martin
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%65%34%
2.94
Jill Phelps
2W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.68
Katelin Sawicki
0W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.