Teams

CV-Willsey

2024 CV Masters' 70s League · CV-Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-02-29vs CV-ParkersonLost 13
W#1 DoublesJane Matelski / Bonnie Paasche vs Edna Swart / Jandi Fraser3-3
L#2 DoublesPatrice Dicasparro / Kerry MacPherson vs Wendy Hawley / Sally Mangina1-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesPetra Gellner / Karen Felton vs Roberta Dierks / Gina Orban3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#5 DoublesHiyam van der Wilde / Mary Austin vs Michele Weddle / Alison Cone4-6, 3-6
2024-02-27vs CV-GiacominiWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarmen Almodovar / Patrice Dicasparro vs Marjo Hull / Eileen Clark1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#4 DoublesPamela Hay / Mary Austin vs Janet Daniel / Tyra Seymour7-5, 6-4
W#5 DoublesKaren Felton / Petra Gellner vs Kathy McArthur / Carel James6-2, 6-4
2024-02-22vs CV-GiacominiWon 21
L#1 DoublesLeslie Zauher / Bonnie Paasche vs Marjo Hull / Sharon Williams6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHiyam van der Wilde / Loretta Gohd vs Janet Daniel / Kathleen Vogel7-6, 6-4
W#5 DoublesBarbara Johnson / Mary Austin vs Leda Potente / Carel James6-1, 6-3
2024-02-15vs CV-RingerSplit 11
W#3 DoublesPaula Wells / Pamela Hay vs Jane Engles / Sandra House6-1, 6-3
L#5 DoublesKaren Felton / Petra Gellner vs Marianne Roth / Nora Vrabek4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-02-13vs CV-GiacominiSplit 11
L#3 DoublesPaula Wells / Pamela Hay vs Diane Fass / Janet Daniel4-6, 2-6
W#5 DoublesBarbara Johnson / Mary Austin vs Carel James / Leda Potente6-3, 6-1
2024-01-25vs CV-RingerSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBonnie Paasche / Jane Matelski vs Farzaneh Kia / Martha Church1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKerry MacPherson / Patrice Dicasparro vs Colleen Muhlbradt / Barbara Johns5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLucille Zapf / Hiyam van der Wilde vs Mary Kern / Laurie Kerr0-6, 1-6
W#4 DoublesMary Austin / Marne Albracht vs Fay Zuccato / Jane Engles5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-01-18vs CV-ParkersonWon 32
W#1 DoublesCarmen Almodovar / Patrice Dicasparro vs Sally Mangina / Jandi Fraser6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKerry MacPherson / Bonnie Paasche vs Edna Swart / Wendy Hawley7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLoretta Gohd / Deborah Rogers vs Michele Weddle / Lindsay Price3-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesPamela Hay / Paula Wells vs Alison Cone / Donna Shawhan1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#5 DoublesPetra Gellner / Karen Felton vs JUDY MCLENNAN / Susan Walker6-3, 6-2
2024-01-04vs CV-RingerLost 13
L#1 DoublesCarmen Almodovar / Patrice Dicasparro vs Gay Hart / Martha Church6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLoretta Gohd / Deborah Rogers vs Theresa Brown / MaryLynn Murphy5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#4 DoublesHiyam van der Wilde / Lucille Zapf vs Jane Engles / Monica Sabo3-6, 5-7
L#5 DoublesMary Austin / Pamela Hay vs Nancy Yazel / Mary Kern7-6, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV-Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Carmen Almodovar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Bonnie Paasche
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Marne Albracht
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Patrice Dicasparro
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.17
Loretta Gohd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Karen Felton
usually #5 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.90
Mary Austin
usually #5 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Paula Wells
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
Hiyam van der Wilde
published
Kerry MacPherson
published
Leslie Zauher
published
Lucille Zapf
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Pamela Hay
published
Petra Gellner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carmen Almodovar + Patrice Dicasparro632258% games−0.9% vs expected
Petra Gellner + Karen Felton123 matchesnot enough data
Paula Wells + Karen Felton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carmen Almodovar
109W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.85
4
Bonnie Paasche
95W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Marne Albracht
52W–30L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.64
4
Patrice Dicasparro
83W–41L career · 5 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Loretta Gohd
70W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
3
Karen Felton
29W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Mary Austin
21W–39L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Paula Wells
27W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
Hiyam van der Wilde
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kerry MacPherson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Leslie Zauher
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lucille Zapf
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Pamela Hay
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Petra Gellner
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.