Teams

SLSGA-Gallagher/CSD 18+ 4.5 Singles

Lake USTA 18 & Over Summer Singles League · Men 4.5 Singles Wed PM

6 players · average NTRP 4.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-06vs SLLAY-Ayala/ CSD 18S 4.5Won 21
W#1 SinglesAndrew Kutsch vs Paul Fackler6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesVamsi Chintalapati vs LUIS AYALA4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesSean Gallagher vs Vaughn Schmutz7-5, 6-3
2025-07-30vs SLKHA-Haynes/CSD 18 4.5 SinglesLost 03
L#1 SinglesAndrew Kutsch vs Chet Kristy5-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesSean Gallagher vs Michael Dedmond3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJeffrey Fontenot vs Charlie King0-6, 5-7
2025-07-23vs SLKHA-Haynes/CSD 18 4.5 SinglesLost 12
W#1 SinglesJaden Wiesinger vs Andres Pazos7-5, 7-5
L#2 SinglesRyan O'Loughlin vs Chet Kristy1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAndrew Kutsch vs Otto Vejsada6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-16vs SLLAY-Ayala/ CSD 18S 4.5Lost 03
L#1 SinglesSean Gallagher vs LUIS AYALA3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJeffrey Fontenot vs Christian Ludwig6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesVamsi Chintalapati vs Vaughn Schmutz3-6, 1-6
2025-06-25vs SLLAY-Ayala/ CSD 18S 4.5Lost 12
W#1 SinglesJaden Wiesinger vs Paul Fackler6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesVamsi Chintalapati vs Christian Ludwig3-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJeffrey Fontenot vs Vaughn Schmutz3-6, 2-6
2025-06-18vs SLKHA-Haynes/CSD 18 4.5 SinglesLost 03
L#1 SinglesAndrew Kutsch vs Andres Pazos1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesSean Gallagher vs Chet Kristy4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesVamsi Chintalapati vs Charlie King2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.5 Singles Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jaden Wiesinger
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.22
Andrew Kutsch
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.11
Sean Gallagher
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.82
Vamsi Chintalapati
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Jeffrey Fontenot
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Ryan O'Loughlin
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jaden Wiesinger
7W–1L career · type T · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Andrew Kutsch
9W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.22
Sean Gallagher
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.11
Vamsi Chintalapati
0W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.82
Jeffrey Fontenot
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan O'Loughlin
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.