Teams

ROUND HILL CC CM6.5A

2024 COMBO · Men 6.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Dan Alster
published 4
3.59
Steve Brashear
published
3.54
Kevin Forster
published
3.42
Stephen Hedden
published
3.36
Michael Abdel-Malek
published
3.31
Kevin Katari
published
3.29
Radu Matei
published
3.28
Greg Raupp
published
Charles Peloquin
published 3.5
3.23
Brandon Zell
published 3.5
3.23
Jeffrey Nornhold
published
3.17
ANTONY HOMENOCK
published 3.5
3.12
Ray Peffer
published
3.11
Jeffrey Nipp
published
3.05
Ken Haworth
published
3.01
Hector Vizcarrondo
published
2.98
David Takeuchi
published 3.5
2.97
Ricardo Angel
published
2.88
Neil Konigsberg
published
2.55
Stefan DeCota
published
Matthew Townsend
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Nornhold + Greg Raupp3257% games+11.9% vs expected
Steve Brashear + Kevin Forster224 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Hedden + Michael Abdel-Malek224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dan Alster
13W–13L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Steve Brashear
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Kevin Forster
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.54
Stephen Hedden
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%27%
3.42
Tim van der Waart van Gulik
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Michael Abdel-Malek
18W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
Kevin Katari
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.31
Radu Matei
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Greg Raupp
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Charles Peloquin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Brandon Zell
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Jeffrey Nornhold
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
ANTONY HOMENOCK
6W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Ray Peffer
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
Jeffrey Nipp
8W–25L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
Ken Haworth
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Hector Vizcarrondo
4W–16L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
3.5
David Takeuchi
5W–17L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98
Ricardo Angel
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.97
Neil Konigsberg
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
2.88
Stefan DeCota
1W–18L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
Matthew Townsend
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.