Teams

Connemara (Gretchen Hughes)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 40 & Over Weekday Women · 4.0 Women (Arrie Lugar)

16 players · average NTRP 3.80 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Arrie Lugar) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Sheila Reese
published
3.79
Mary Edelberg
published
3.78
Allison Ellison
published 4
3.76
Heather Paden
published
3.72
Cherrie Broome
published 4
3.72
Joanna Shackelford
published
3.68
3.60
Lacy Wade
published
3.59
Mary Saye
published
3.56
Kallie Clack
published
3.55
Teresa Burke
published
3.30
Diana Lerner
published 3.5
Allie Burns
published 3.5
Gretchen Hughes
published
Jennifer Moseley
published
Kathryn Hamilton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kallie Clack + Joanna Shackelford5159% games+2.5% vs expected
Teresa Burke + Diana Lerner4252% games+0.0% vs expected
Mary Saye + Joanna Shackelford4257% gamesnot enough data
Christina Schultze + Cherrie Broome314 matchesnot enough data
Mary Saye + Heather Paden303 matchesnot enough data
Cherrie Broome + Allison Ellison303 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Moseley + Mary Edelberg303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheila Reese
23W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
Mary Edelberg
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Allison Ellison
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Heather Paden
38W–15L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Cherrie Broome
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Joanna Shackelford
19W–16L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Christina Schultze
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Lacy Wade
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Mary Saye
57W–46L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
Kallie Clack
21W–13L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Teresa Burke
16W–19L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Diana Lerner
53W–36L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Allie Burns
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gretchen Hughes
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Moseley
13W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathryn Hamilton
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.