Teams

Harrison

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 18 & OVER · WOMEN 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-28vs HALLERLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynn Felton / An Politi vs Caitlynn Goheen / Genevieve Hansler6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-26vs Atterbury 18Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAn Politi vs Karen McCarty3-6, 5-7
2025-04-21vs Greene 18+Won 10
W#1 SinglesAn Politi vs Julia Griffin6-1, 6-0
2025-03-29vs Wilson 18+ 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Claus / An Politi vs Melissa Straub / Laurie Sullivan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-22vs MainWon 10
W#1 DoublesWhitney Harrison / An Politi vs Tess Casals / Ashley Doyle6-1, 6-1
2025-03-08vs ThompsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesLynn Felton / An Politi vs Hope Conway / Sara Beth Gammons6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Cari Hopson
published 4.5
3.90
Elizabeth Claus
published
3.88
Wesley Barker
published
3.85
Jackie Cruse
published
3.85
Lynn Felton
published
3.84
An Politi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.72
Kathryn Weeks
published
3.68
Kelly Catino
published
3.64
Whitney Harrison
published
3.58
Madison Seidel
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.55
Lara Hanks
published
Lara Schuhmann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Felton + An Politi9259% games+7.7% vs expected
Lara Hanks + Elizabeth Claus4460% games+4.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cari Hopson
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.12
Elizabeth Claus
35W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
Wesley Barker
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.88
Jackie Cruse
37W–37L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.85
Lynn Felton
19W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.85
4
An Politi
205W–124L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Kathryn Weeks
21W–22L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Kelly Catino
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Whitney Harrison
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
Madison Seidel
52W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Lara Hanks
14W–25L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Lara Schuhmann
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.