Teams

Cedars Levy

2021 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Weekend · 3.5 W Saturday

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-26vs Sarasota Sports Club WindsorWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Piotrowski / Julie Pipes vs Dee Mirski / Mauri Blefeld6-1, 7-6
2021-06-12vs Sarasota - GT Bray SherrLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Piotrowski / Julie Pipes vs Sandra Poston / Beth Arndt3-6, 3-6
2021-06-05vs Payne Park VandendoorenWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Piotrowski / Julie Pipes vs Michele Vandendooren / Robin Sheridan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-22vs Sarasota Sports Club WindsorLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Pipes / Mary Piotrowski vs Lori Childers / Juvilyn Sutherland4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmy DiSalvo / Diana Trivax Levy vs Dee Mirski / Olga Alan6-7, 3-6
2021-05-15vs Sarasota - GT Bray SherrLost 02
L#1 SinglesJulie Pipes vs Margaret Kirkland2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Trivax Levy / Amy DiSalvo vs Lisa Simotes / Ann Kelmenson1-6, 2-6
2021-05-01vs Payne Park VandendoorenLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Piotrowski / Julie Pipes vs Suzy Feinberg / Rebecca Gibson3-6, 5-7
2021-04-24vs Sarasota Sports Club WindsorSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Piotrowski / Julie Pipes vs Lori Madden / Kellie Mcnary6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDiana Trivax Levy / MARIA FERNANDA LLOYD vs Lauren Feingold Navas / Olga Alan3-6, 2-6
2021-04-17vs Sarasota - GT Bray SherrWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Piotrowski / Julie Pipes vs Leanna Jackson / Brenda Mike6-1, 6-2
2021-04-10vs Payne Park VandendoorenLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Piotrowski / Cindy Davis vs Michele Vandendooren / Robin Sheridan5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJulie Pipes vs Rebecca Gibson0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Lisa Tschetter
published
3.24
Julie Pipes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.08
Diana Trivax Levy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Cindy Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jacqueline Moore
published 3
Marcia Gutridge
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Tschetter
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Julie Pipes
82W–46L career · 9 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Diana Trivax Levy
65W–89L career · 3 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Cindy Davis
93W–49L career · 1 line in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.00
3
Jacqueline Moore
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
MARIA FERNANDA LLOYD
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Marcia Gutridge
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.