Teams

AAbbott (Charlotte CC)

2024 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 8.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-20vs TKessler/Ware (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Bumgardner / Jocelyn Rose vs Lauren Thurmond / Mary Holland3-6, 3-6
2024-09-13vs TGreen/FOno (Chestnut Square)Won 10
W#1 DoublesCT Anderson / Mary Peterson vs Amy Guear / Danna Jean Pompeo6-3, 6-4
2024-09-06vs EMcCombs (WSRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJocelyn Rose / Connell Pinckney vs Dorothy Cato / Terri Kimner6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2024-08-30vs JCugliari (BCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesHenrietta Richardson / Connell Pinckney vs Courtney Broadway / Wendy Lutgring6-4, 6-0
2024-08-23vs TDries/TOrmand (Raintree)Won 20
W#1 DoublesScott Bryan / CT Anderson vs Jeanette Kantor / Vanessa Elias6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAllison Bumgardner / Henrietta Richardson vs Barbara Chase / Tanya Ormand6-1, 6-1
2024-08-16vs VAke (OPRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAllison Bumgardner / Henrietta Richardson vs Kristine Evans / Jill Marcus6-2, 6-2
2024-08-09vs AConger/EFarnham (OPRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesConnell Pinckney / Scott Bryan vs Ashley Smith / Jenny Duncan6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
CT Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Brigid Downs
published 4.5
4.08
Allison Bumgardner
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.06
Scott Bryan
published
3.92
Mary Peterson
published
3.92
Spencer Blythe
published
3.81
Christina Desai
published 4
3.77
Connell Pinckney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Jocelyn Rose
published
3.72
Stacy Pace
published
3.70
3.65
Jennifer Mansfield
published
3.21
Allison Abbott
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
CT Anderson
24W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Brigid Downs
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Allison Bumgardner
25W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
4.08
Scott Bryan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
4.06
Mary Peterson
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.92
Spencer Blythe
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Christina Desai
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Connell Pinckney
24W–21L career · type S · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Jocelyn Rose
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Stacy Pace
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
3.72
Henrietta Richardson
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
Jennifer Mansfield
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Allison Abbott
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.