Teams

SGV Tennis Addicts-James Lee-Arroyo HS/Su10

2025 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesVacheh W Avanessian / Clay Tweel vs Sam Bruchey / Peter Stokes7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 Doublesbrian Lee / Brian Ree vs Chipper Pastron / Aaron Simpson6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGregory Lau / Jasen Ha vs Christian Hart / Alfred Navarro6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesGregory Lau / Hai Trinh vs James Grollman / George Yang6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesVacheh W Avanessian / Clay Tweel vs Steven Chow / Century Yang6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid Chian / Geoff Heminway vs Jimmy Cheng / Jon Pang6-3, 7-6
W#1 DoublesKhang Nguyen / Vacheh W Avanessian vs Abraam Guirguis / Thai Nguyen6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesGregory Lau / David Chian vs Vic Kan / Rick Le0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesHai Trinh / Tyson Wang vs Rong Huang / Matthew Hui0-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesDavid Chian / Tyson Wang vs Sandeep Kamalon / Derek Novacek6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVacheh W Avanessian / Clay Tweel vs Basudev Thoppai Vidyasankar / Yijun Zhang6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGregory Lau / Ethan Park vs Kenneth Chen / Johnny Wong6-0, 6-1
L#1 DoublesTyson Wang / David Chian vs Kawnmai Sumlut / Balaji Alahari4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesClay Tweel / Andy Baker vs Henry Martinez / Ramesh Bandaru6-2, 6-0
2025-10-04vs SGV Maple Team-Lin-WN-SA10Won 21
W#1 DoublesClay Tweel / Hai Trinh vs Dong Kim / Jacky Lin6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesEthan Park / Jasen Ha vs Jun Yuan / Yonggang Zhang6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesVacheh W Avanessian / Andy Baker vs Jie Wang / Neil Nieh2-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesClay Tweel / Vacheh W Avanessian vs Gerald Alphonse / Irineo Galvan5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEthan Park / brian Lee vs Ted Shen / Jonathan Phan6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGregory Lau / Jasen Ha vs Alejandro Mejia / Placido MacAraeg3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-14vs SGV Ball Hogs-Yip-Arroyo/SU2Won 21
L#1 Doublesbrian Lee / Brian Ree vs Carl Compton / Ronald Yip6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesClay Tweel / Andy Baker vs Jordan Curiel / Damien Aries7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJasen Ha / Gregory Lau vs David Hillel / Charles Do6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Clay Tweel
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.56
David Chian
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.54
Michelle Wong
published
3.54
Ethan Park
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Gregory Lau
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.43
Jasen Ha
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.40
James Lee
published
3.35
Hai Trinh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Brian Ree
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Andy Baker
published 3.5
3.25
Vacheh W Avanessian
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Geoff Heminway
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
brian Lee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Tyson Wang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Jason Tien
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregory Lau + Jasen Ha6068% games+5.5% vs expected
Vacheh W Avanessian + Clay Tweel5059% games+3.2% vs expected
Gregory Lau + David Chian213 matchesnot enough data
Ethan Park + Brian Ree213 matchesnot enough data
brian Lee + Brian Ree123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Clay Tweel
17W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
David Chian
16W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.56
Michelle Wong
23W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.54
Ethan Park
31W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.54
Gregory Lau
13W–1L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Jasen Ha
16W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
James Lee
25W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
Hai Trinh
26W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.35
3.5
Brian Ree
8W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Andy Baker
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vacheh W Avanessian
9W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Geoff Heminway
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
brian Lee
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
Tyson Wang
12W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
Jason Tien
20W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.