Teams

WP RED

2022 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-16vs DTC NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelli Pfaff / Kari Cao vs Mary McFadyen / Pamela Marsh1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesValeska Schwarz vs Laura Koupal2-6, 3-6
2022-04-09vs EM BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Barry / Valeska Schwarz vs Tiffany Sandusky / Jean Steimel4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMary Ocampo vs Katy Kappler1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKelli Pfaff / Britt Nielsen vs Kari Hale / Jill Wichlens6-4, 6-1
2022-04-02vs GTC GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesKari Cao / Mary Ocampo vs Jennifer Ranum / Kelly Goodnough2-6
L#1 SinglesBritt Nielsen vs Karen Allaire6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Pollman / Kim Barry vs Kerri Brown / Ginny Crise6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-03-26vs SKY REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Ocampo / Jennifer Pollman vs Beth Godzich / Lyndsey McLaughlan2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBritt Nielsen vs Sara Visser3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKari Cao / Valeska Schwarz vs Jocelyn Murphy / Erin Mann3-6, 3-6
2022-03-19vs GAC GOLDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Pollman / Mary Ocampo vs Tracy Sickels / Kay Christensen7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBritt Nielsen vs Rhonda Buder2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Kari Cao
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Kim Barry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Kelli Pfaff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.27
Britt Nielsen
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.25
Jennifer Pollman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Ocampo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Valeska Schwarz
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelli Pfaff + Kari Cao91052% games+1.8% vs expected
Jennifer Pollman + Mary Ocampo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kari Cao
54W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
Kim Barry
39W–22L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Kelli Pfaff
36W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
2.65
2.5
Britt Nielsen
28W–66L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%96%4%
2.27
Jennifer Pollman
24W–59L career · 3 lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
2.25
Mary Ocampo
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Valeska Schwarz
1W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.