Teams

ATC VARGHESE

2025 Fall FW Mixed 18 Social League · 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-26vs CCC WONDERLY/SPURGEONLost 12
L#1 DoublesTracey Kesterson / Darrell Dreith vs Katelyn Weber / Jason Weber0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKent Rasmussen / Natasha Chevalier vs Harold Johnson / Megan Bennett6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBARRY LANE / Lara Lucas vs Stephanie Bennett / John Bennett3-6, 1-6
2025-09-07vs CCC WONDERLY/SPURGEONLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Voss / Lori Voss vs Megan Bennett / Anthony Wonderly1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDarrell Dreith / Suzanne Lewis vs Molly Keathley / Michael ONeil1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Varghese / Kent Rasmussen vs Julie ONeil / Joshua Leonard2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Gerald Webb
published
2.94
Natasha Chevalier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Darrell Dreith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Rick Chevalier
published
2.85
Tracey Kesterson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Lara Lucas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Elizabeth Varghese
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
BARRY LANE
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Frank Oliver
published
Kent Rasmussen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lori Voss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Voss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Voss + Michael Voss4249% gamesnot enough data
Kent Rasmussen + Elizabeth Varghese033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gerald Webb
4W–22L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Natasha Chevalier
30W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Darrell Dreith
15W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Rick Chevalier
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Tracey Kesterson
14W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Lara Lucas
10W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
Elizabeth Varghese
14W–55L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
BARRY LANE
2W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
Frank Oliver
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kent Rasmussen
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Voss
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Voss
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.