Teams

RC WITTEN/KOSTOHRYZ

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-26vs CCC HOLTWon 41
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Brookshire / Hannah Witten vs Suzanne Burroughs / Jennifer Bekish6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTraci Larrison vs Amanda Easley6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Deegan / McKenzie DePriest vs Erin Greer / Karen Reid6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMegan Porterfield vs Natalie Henrikson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathryn Little / Brooke Green vs Adrienne Makens / Ashley Berzon1-6, 4-6
2025-04-14vs STC KISTLost 23
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Brookshire / Morgan Kostohryz vs Lindsey Castner / Michelle Lonergan6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAllison Nixon vs Kiley Puckett6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHannah Witten / Megan Porterfield vs Cara Kist / Abby Hyman2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJennie Doumany vs Kirsten Fishel6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPaige Cooper / Sara Wagner vs Leigh Ann Downing / Lauren Biery3-6, 2-6
2025-04-01vs CCC GRENNAN/ROSENSTEINLost 14
L#1 DoublesMeagan Nayfa / Elizabeth Deegan vs Pamela Gilchrist / Haley Seaver6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAnna Farley vs Chloe Hodges3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMcKenzie DePriest / Kathryn Little vs Katie Coultress / Sharon Fulgham3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAshley Harrison vs Anna Pastusek6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHannah Witten / Sara Wagner vs Skylar O'Neal / Merrell Banks5-7, 6-7
2025-03-07vs RID SELKING/CODYWon 41
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Brookshire / Paige Cooper vs Melinda Delk / Stacy Hollis6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAllison Nixon vs Ashley Healey6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMegan Porterfield / Hannah Witten vs Lauren Selking / MEREDITH CODY2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJennie Doumany vs Lauren Smith6-4
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Deegan / McKenzie DePriest vs Natalie Moore / Whitney Perry6-0, 6-4
2025-02-28vs BIR FERRELL***Split 22
W#1 DoublesHannah Witten / Megan Porterfield vs Heidi Slansky / Preeti Rangee6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAnna Farley vs Samantha Dubeck6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMorgan Kostohryz / McKenzie DePriest vs Patty Hart / Lisa Huszar4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLaine Bechtel vs Timary Wyre4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Allison Nixon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Elizabeth Brookshire
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.01
Paige Cooper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Elizabeth Deegan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Megan Porterfield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.77
Meagan Nayfa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ashley Harrison
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.74
McKenzie DePriest
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Hannah Witten
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.65
Anna Farley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.65
Jennie Doumany
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.59
Morgan Kostohryz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Melinda Adams
published
2.50
Laine Bechtel
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.42
Kathryn Little
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.18
Brooke Green
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Traci Larrison
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hannah Witten + Megan Porterfield4447% games+0.8% vs expected
Allison Nixon + Elizabeth Deegan213 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Brookshire + Morgan Kostohryz213 matchesnot enough data
McKenzie DePriest + Meagan Nayfa213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allison Nixon
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Elizabeth Brookshire
8W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
Paige Cooper
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Elizabeth Deegan
12W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
Megan Porterfield
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
Meagan Nayfa
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Ashley Harrison
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
McKenzie DePriest
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Hannah Witten
8W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Anna Farley
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Jennie Doumany
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Morgan Kostohryz
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Melinda Adams
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Laine Bechtel
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
Kathryn Little
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
2.5
Brooke Green
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Traci Larrison
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.