Teams

Su.Knowles55C

2026 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-24vs Ja.Terrell55CLost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy Faltisco / Mary Margaret Patton vs Sherrie Lefere / Noelle Jackson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLeigh Magee / Fran Ange vs Suzanne Brown / Rebecca Procter3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarol Muth / Susanne Knowles vs Elisebeth Gelardi / Kim McDonald4-6, 6-7
2026-08-17vs Ca.Conzola55C7.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Muth / Roseanne Orman vs Jane Hunter / Lisa Kempf0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Faltisco / Lynn Trefzger vs Helen Cuccaro / Erin McAllister0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusanne Knowles / Leigh Magee vs Camille Conzola / Laura Davidson2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Cindy Faltisco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Carol Muth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.53
Ginger Sluder
published
3.53
Leigh Magee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.33
Mary Margaret Patton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Dana Chapman
published 3.5
3.29
Roseanne Orman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Fran Ange
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Suzanne Wagner
published
3.22
Susanne Knowles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Barbara Mccartney
published 3.5
3.13
Ann Willard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Lynn Trefzger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Heidi Duggins
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fran Ange + Heidi Duggins1944% gamesnot enough data
Fran Ange + Leigh Magee6355% gamesnot enough data
Fran Ange + Susanne Knowles4155% gamesnot enough data
Ann Willard + Heidi Duggins2346% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Duggins + Dana Chapman5058% gamesnot enough data
Leigh Magee + Heidi Duggins224 matchesnot enough data
Susanne Knowles + Heidi Duggins134 matchesnot enough data
Ann Willard + Suzanne Wagner224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Faltisco
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Carol Muth
8W–8L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Ginger Sluder
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Leigh Magee
45W–74L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
Mary Margaret Patton
10W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Dana Chapman
56W–66L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Roseanne Orman
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Fran Ange
74W–100L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Suzanne Wagner
9W–9L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Susanne Knowles
94W–122L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Barbara Mccartney
4W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Ann Willard
10W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Lynn Trefzger
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Heidi Duggins
95W–121L career · no lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.