Teams

LA - Tightly Strung

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over – LA · LA - Women 3.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-06vs LA-LLW-Lady Aces-Kim DavisSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAnne Tlusty / Kendra Jackson vs Kimara Davis / Katherine Reed6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKyoko Arikura vs Tonya Crowe1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBeryl Mendelson / Diana Winters vs Cass Casseus / Sheronda Smith6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Cahill-Murphy / Crystal Alexander vs Heidi Reed / Christine Watson4-6, 2-6
2025-03-01vs LA - Mooney MatesWon 10
W#1 DoublesVanessa Bustillos / Bita Nasseri vs Jacquelyn Chen / Susan Han6-2, 6-3
2025-02-23vs LA - WeHo SlicersLost 01
L#2 DoublesBita Nasseri / Diana Winters vs Danielle Demianczyk / Darby Maloney5-7, 0-6
2025-01-19vs LA - Canyon Coyotes 3.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMorgan Handel / Bita Nasseri vs Annie Carmona / Joy Cho3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Kendra Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Lara Azzopardi
published
3.07
Karen Minikes
published
2.90
Vanessa Bustillos
published
2.88
Anne Tlusty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Bita Nasseri
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.80
Heidi Cotton
published
Catherine Cahill-Murphy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Susan Moreno
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Kyoko Arikura
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.68
Beryl Mendelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Morgan Handel
published
2.66
Crystal Alexander
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Stephanie Tsai
published
2.60
Martha Swiller
published
2.59
Diana Winters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Kandus Simpson
published
2.50
Michele Moshay
published
2.35
2.33
Elizabeth Dill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Crystal Alexander + Beryl Mendelson2453% gamesnot enough data
Martha Swiller + Kyoko Arikura224 matchesnot enough data
Vanessa Bustillos + Bita Nasseri224 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Tsai + Elizabeth Dill033 matchesnot enough data
Kyoko Arikura + Elizabeth Dill123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kendra Jackson
18W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
Lara Azzopardi
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
Karen Minikes
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
Vanessa Bustillos
18W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Anne Tlusty
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Bita Nasseri
22W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Heidi Cotton
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.80
3
Catherine Cahill-Murphy
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Moreno
26W–57L career · 3 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.74
Kyoko Arikura
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Beryl Mendelson
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Morgan Handel
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Crystal Alexander
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Stephanie Tsai
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.65
Martha Swiller
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Diana Winters
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Kandus Simpson
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Michele Moshay
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Teresa Throenle-Somaini
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.35
Elizabeth Dill
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.