Teams

MARION/David/Women/7.5

2022 Marion Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Combo 50 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-10vs FK - HatfieldWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarti Little / Rayetta Spina vs Pamela Plumlee / Susan Atwell4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-12-03vs High StrungSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPamelia Payne / Terri DeMartino vs Eileen Lombardo / Dina Sapienza3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMarti Little / Rayetta Spina vs Kimberly Brewer / Margaret Quick7-6, 6-0
2022-10-29vs SMW - BrownWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarti Little / Rayetta Spina vs Sheila Etchison / Vicki Lavoie6-2, 6-2
2022-10-22vs SKY - ArcobelloWon 10
W#3 DoublesPamelia Payne / Henny David vs Kim Arcobello / Helen Sweeney6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2022-10-15vs Villages Hoops/ParkerLost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Lademann / Irma Buttermore vs Terry Shick / Judy Hoops3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-08vs Villages - Perkins/PlanteWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarti Little / Rayetta Spina vs Maricel Keiter / Judy Smith6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLinda Lademann / Irma Buttermore vs Susan Bry / Sally Perkins6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 50 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Ellen Barnes
published 4
3.24
Irma Buttermore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Judy Weber
published
2.97
Henny David
published 3.5
Linda Lademann
published
Lynne Finman
published
Pamelia Payne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Rayetta Spina
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Rita Meek
published
Sarah Collinson
published
Suzanne Busk
published
Tana Hubbard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamelia Payne + Irma Buttermore5941% gamesnot enough data
Henny David + Tana Hubbard134 matchesnot enough data
Irma Buttermore + Rayetta Spina213 matchesnot enough data
Irma Buttermore + Rita Meek123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ellen Barnes
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Irma Buttermore
86W–80L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Judy Weber
0W–12L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.02
3.5
Henny David
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
Linda Lademann
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynne Finman
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamelia Payne
36W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rayetta Spina
110W–77L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rita Meek
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Collinson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzanne Busk
19W–34L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tana Hubbard
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.