Teams

PLEASANTON CM6.5A

2021 COMBO · Men 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-11-28Lost 01
L#3 DoublesVamsi Boppudi / Narayana Rao Surapaneni vs Michael Ford / Chris Manios5-7, 2-6
2021-10-30vs DOUGHERTY VALLEY HS CM6.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesNarayana Rao Surapaneni / Ravindra Samson vs Giridharan Anandan / VenkataChari SampathKumar3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-10-10vs CROW CANYON CC CM6.5BWon 10
W#1 DoublesVamsikrishna Paladugu / Vamsi Boppudi vs Michael Ford / Terry Feng6-2, 6-2
2021-09-18vs STONEBRAE CM6.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesVamsi Boppudi / Narayana Rao Surapaneni vs Daniel Hodsdon / Hong Choing7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Raghupal Bejjanki
published
3.39
Vamsi Boppudi
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Shiv Sharma
published 3.5
3.24
Sreerama Garikapati
published
3.24
ANAND MADDULA
published 3.5
3.14
3.13
Narayana Rao Surapaneni
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Ravindra Samson
published
2.90
Manoj Lakinana
published 3
2.87
Praveen Gadi
published 3
2.66
Santosh Bisht
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vamsi Boppudi + Narayana Rao Surapaneni4448% games+1.0% vs expected
Narayana Rao Surapaneni + Shiv Sharma6261% gamesnot enough data
Manoj Lakinana + Shiv Sharma5065% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Raghupal Bejjanki
11W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
3.41
4
Vamsi Boppudi
91W–62L career · 8 lines in 2021
80%20%<1%
3.39
3.5
Shiv Sharma
69W–27L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sreerama Garikapati
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
ANAND MADDULA
7W–11L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
Vamsikrishna Paladugu
1W–9L career · no lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Narayana Rao Surapaneni
87W–76L career · 3 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.13
Ravindra Samson
4W–7L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Manoj Lakinana
65W–53L career · no lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Praveen Gadi
50W–31L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
2.87
Santosh Bisht
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.