Teams

HV YELLOW

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

10 players · average NTRP 3.29 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-31Lost 01
L#1 SinglesPiper Vitale vs Irene Serrano Delgado5-7, 2-6
2024-08-29vs LTFC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesLibby Palmer / Morgen Calgaard vs Erin Clark / Janet Hill2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPiper Vitale vs Laura Else6-7, 3-6
2024-08-15vs HW BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesTRACY DUHIG / Cassie George vs Meredith van Wyk / Kirsten Washer2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPiper Vitale vs Lauren Francis6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLibby Palmer / Morgen Calgaard vs Melissa Miller / Kim Williams6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2024-08-01vs HG PINKLost 02
L#1 DoublesTRACY DUHIG / Courtney Claussen vs Kelly Harrison / Ashley Herndon1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMorgen Calgaard vs Mollie Smith4-6, 2-6
2024-07-25vs LEBTC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesTRACY DUHIG / Cassie George vs Jacqueline Tynes / Lisa DeBastos2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Cassie George
published 3.5
3.31
Piper Vitale
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Morgen Calgaard
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
TRACY DUHIG
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Libby Palmer
published
3.14
Theresa Mehringer
published
3.01
Ashley Larson
published 3
2.94
Brooke Burdic
published 3
2.69
Rhonda Williamson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Morgen Calgaard + Libby Palmer41146% games+6.5% vs expected
Libby Palmer + TRACY DUHIG3250% games+1.5% vs expected
Piper Vitale + Morgen Calgaard1441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cassie George
21W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Piper Vitale
39W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Morgen Calgaard
29W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
TRACY DUHIG
16W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Libby Palmer
9W–15L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Theresa Mehringer
10W–16L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
3
Ashley Larson
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Brooke Burdic
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Courtney Claussen
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rhonda Williamson
6W–15L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.