Teams

Malone-3.0M-PB

2026 Team Singles Tournament-PB · 3.0 M

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-01Won 10
W#1 SinglesMichael Butler vs Kazuki Sato4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-03-01vs Taylor-3.0M-GCWon 21
W#1 SinglesShea Malone vs Joseph Huynh6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAllen Boleware vs Drew Bosarge7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesDerek Tait vs Patrick Taylor3-6, 1-6
2026-03-01Won 20
W#1 SinglesTristan Clemons vs Hunter Coleman6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMichael Butler vs Michael Gann6-0, 6-1
2026-03-01vs Sherrod-3.0M-JXNLost 12
L#1 SinglesTristan Clemons vs Ian Kimball2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesChandler Laudenheimer vs Matthew Weeks2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesAllen Boleware vs James Johnson7-6, 6-2
2026-02-28Won 10
W#1 SinglesMichael Butler vs Cagen Garriga6-0, 6-0
2026-02-28Won 10
W#1 SinglesTristan Clemons vs Kazuki Sato6-2, 6-2
2026-02-28vs Deans-3.0M-PBWon 21
L#1 SinglesShea Malone vs Amandeep Singh1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAllen Boleware vs Connor Boleware6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 SinglesDerek Tait vs Tom Hall6-2, 6-3
2026-02-28vs Medina-3.0M-JXNLost 12
L#1 SinglesShea Malone vs Christian Medina6-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAllen Boleware vs Davis Roberson7-6, 6-3
L#3 SinglesMichael Butler vs Stephen Baldwyn6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-02-28vs Jabil-3.0M-NEWon 21
W#1 SinglesChandler Laudenheimer vs Andy Burleson6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAllen Boleware vs Gary Russell1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesMichael Butler vs Thomas Young6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.0 M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sherrod-3.0M-JXN419613122
2Medina-3.0M-JXN419614130
3Taylor-3.0M-GC3210512120
4Malone-3.0M-PB328717145
5Jabil-3.0M-NE146919138
6Deans-3.0M-PB0531225167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Allen Boleware
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.88
Michael Butler
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published
2.83
Chandler Laudenheimer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.81
Tristan Clemons
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.78
Derek Tait
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.59
Shea Malone
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shea Malone + Michael Butler2443% games+5.5% vs expected
Michael Butler + Allen Boleware213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allen Boleware
70W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Michael Butler
50W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.88
3
Chandler Laudenheimer
21W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
Tristan Clemons
16W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.81
3
Derek Tait
21W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
2.78
Shea Malone
16W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.