Teams

HG RED

2024 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-30vs PRC NAVYLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Zook / Brian Zook vs Jason Kinsey / Elizabeth Anderson7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJohn Cadkin / Katherine Flecky vs Lisa Wiggins / Sachin Madan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJim Malcolm / Elizabeth Cadkin vs Dushyanth David Maguluru / Keenan Young3-6, 4-6
2024-06-23vs PRC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Zook / Brian Zook vs Pat Conroy / Julie Hernandez1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKatherine Flecky / Bryan Langman vs DAVID DALESSANDRO / Morgan Mayoss4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-16vs LTFC PURPLELost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Silverman / Bryan Langman vs Virginia Gamble / Bob Gamble1-6, 4-6
2024-06-09vs SS-LT GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Cadkin / John Cadkin vs Karen Ruwe / Jim Steavpack3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-02vs GAC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Cadkin / Elizabeth Cadkin vs Roland Hom / Alison Wheeler6-3, 6-3
2024-05-26vs GCC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Cadkin / John Cadkin vs Emer Dempsey / James Dempsey2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Silverman / Bryan Langman vs Tricia Blechman / Scott Blechman2-6, 4-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Elizabeth Cadkin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Katherine Flecky
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.32
Jim Malcolm
published
3.28
Brian Zook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
John Cadkin
published
2.91
Bryan Langman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Heidi David
published
Lisa Zook
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Zook + Brian Zook3349% games−7.6% vs expected
John Cadkin + Elizabeth Cadkin314 matchesnot enough data
Bryan Langman + Katherine Flecky303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Cadkin
72W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.90
4
Katherine Flecky
73W–47L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
Jim Malcolm
21W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Brian Zook
60W–68L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
John Cadkin
20W–14L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Bryan Langman
21W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
Heidi David
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Zook
19W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.