Teams

Sargent/McKeown/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 4.5 Men - Sunday PM

17 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-24vs Bates/NashvilleLost 13
W#1 DoublesMadison Mummert / Connor Malchow vs Shane Hutton / Tyler Strong6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDaniel Oxford vs Andrew Kantor5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDrew Thimme / Robert Grimes vs Charlie Sevier / Andrew Solarski2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMichael McKeown vs Diego Salinas3-6, 2-6
2024-11-17vs Bates/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesMadison Mummert / Ryan Hitt vs Christopher Bates / Andrew Kantor3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrannon Jones / Daniel Oxford vs Bradley Ternes / Charlie Sevier6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-11-03vs Bates/NashvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesMadison Mummert / Ali Murad vs Bradley Ternes / Andrew Solarski6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrannon Jones / James Fong vs Kory Craighead / Charlie Sevier3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAlexander Hirsch vs Andrew Kantor6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Faldetta / Mark Sargent vs Tyler Strong / Shane Hutton2-6, 1-6
2024-10-27vs Bates/NashvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesRyan Hitt / Doug Story vs Kory Craighead / Christopher Bates2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesDaniel Oxford vs Andrew Kantor7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesConnor Malchow / Randy Kerr vs Diego Salinas / Charles Hawkins4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMichael McKeown vs Jordan Younghouse1-6, 3-6
2024-10-20vs Bates/NashvilleSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBrannon Jones / Alexander Hirsch vs Kory Craighead / Jordan Younghouse3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDoug Story / Robert Grimes vs Andrew Kantor / Andrew Solarski6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCharles McCray vs David Hamrin7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSean Hughes / John Faldetta vs Bradley Ternes / Jake Ward4-6, 3-6
2024-10-13vs Bates/NashvilleLost 23
W#1 DoublesAli Murad / Connor Malchow vs Andrew Solarski / Diego Salinas6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesCharles McCray vs Christopher Bates6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRyan Hitt / Daniel Oxford vs Charles Hawkins / David Hamrin4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMichael McKeown vs Bradley Ternes1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRandy Kerr / Doug Story vs Andrew Kantor / David Carrillo5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men - Sunday PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Connor Malchow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.35
Daniel Oxford
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.31
Charles McCray
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.29
Ryan Hitt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.28
Doug Story
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Alexander Hirsch
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Ali Murad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Brannon Jones
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
John Faldetta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.14
James Fong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.12
Michael McKeown
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.06
Randy Kerr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.04
Robert Grimes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Sean Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Mark Sargent
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Drew Thimme
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Madison Mummert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael McKeown + Mark Sargent2343% games+7.5% vs expected
Robert Grimes + Doug Story134 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Oxford + Ryan Hitt213 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Hitt + John Faldetta303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Connor Malchow
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
4.37
4.5
Daniel Oxford
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
4.35
4.5
Charles McCray
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
Ryan Hitt
12W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
Doug Story
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Alexander Hirsch
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Ali Murad
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Brannon Jones
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Faldetta
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
James Fong
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
4.14
Michael McKeown
15W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.12
Randy Kerr
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.06
Robert Grimes
2W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.04
Sean Hughes
0W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.92
Mark Sargent
7W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.84
Drew Thimme
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Madison Mummert
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.