Teams

GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Bordier/EPTC#1

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.92 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-23Won 10
W#2 SinglesAngelique Rubio vs Delaney Kuehnel4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-06Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAngelique Rubio vs Megan Harris4-6, 3-6
2026-04-25Won 10
W#2 SinglesAngelique Rubio vs Valerie Santos6-4, 6-3
2026-04-04Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAngelique Rubio vs Brianna Barreiro2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Erika Licon
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 4
3.73
Angelique Rubio
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.66
Angelica Ares
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.64
Beatrice Maese
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.64
Bianca Loya
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.04
Belinda Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
Lillian Ordonez
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Linda Rowse
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Marisa Porras
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Niria Yepo
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Paula Prado
usually #2 Doubles 37%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Rocio Molina
usually #3 Doubles 37%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Rosanna Missirian
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Vanessa Herrera
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Veronica Perusquia
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Zulem Bordier
usually #1 Doubles 32%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zulem Bordier + Erika Licon9457% games+10.2% vs expected
Rosanna Missirian + Erika Licon8953% games−6.3% vs expected
Marisa Porras + Erika Licon9261% gamesnot enough data
Niria Yepo + Lillian Ordonez10161% gamesnot enough data
Marisa Porras + Paula Prado3354% gamesnot enough data
Marisa Porras + Niria Yepo4251% gamesnot enough data
Marisa Porras + Rosanna Missirian3354% gamesnot enough data
Vanessa Herrera + Rosanna Missirian4265% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erika Licon
76W–61L career · 22 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Angelique Rubio
2W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Angelica Ares
65W–58L career · 20 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Beatrice Maese
75W–87L career · 15 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Bianca Loya
42W–32L career · 11 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Belinda Fernandez
57W–57L career · type A · 13 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
Lillian Ordonez
87W–41L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Rowse
41W–17L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marisa Porras
94W–53L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Niria Yepo
43W–29L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paula Prado
42W–46L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rocio Molina
78W–48L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rosanna Missirian
112W–86L career · 29 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vanessa Herrera
45W–66L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Veronica Perusquia
20W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Zulem Bordier
95W–63L career · 33 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.