Teams

Roberts/JB/3Oaks

2025 Adult 40 & Over Spring league 2.5-4.0 · 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-12vs Whitby/JB/APLost 05
L#1 DoublesJena Copeland / Calandra Short vs Chamblee Witherspoon / Wendy Evins1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJenny Box vs Jennifer Fancher1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSusa Digaetano / Karla Nortier vs Lorie Whitby / Brooke Burris1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesShelly Little / Tracy Roberts vs Mindy Lancaster / Donna Gilbert2-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesLeah Willett / Sarah Milton vs Shannon Crocker / Sharon McDaniel2-6, 3-6
2025-03-11vs Whitby/JB/APLost 05
L#1 DoublesJenny Box / Lisa Waggoner vs Chamblee Witherspoon / Brooke Burris3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSusa Digaetano vs Lorie Whitby5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTanya Ellington / Joan Khilling vs Kelly Dionne Moody Parker / Andrea Seeman4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Brown / Karla Nortier vs Mindy Lancaster / Wendy Evins4-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesShelly Little / Tracy Roberts vs Heather Holt / Deana Muegge3-6, 3-6
2025-03-03vs Whitby/JB/APLost 05
L#1 DoublesMandy Folden / Amy Brown vs Lorie Whitby / Andrea Seeman3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesMegan Neugebauer vs Jennifer Fancher3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Milton / Joan Khilling vs Donna Gilbert / Shannon Crocker7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJenny Box / Tanya Ellington vs Kelly Dionne Moody Parker / Wendy Evins1-6, 6-7
L#4 DoublesSusa Digaetano / Karla Nortier vs Mindy Lancaster / Amanda Windmeyer1-6, 0-6
2025-02-25vs Whitby/JB/APLost 14
L#1 DoublesLisa Waggoner / Mandy Folden vs Lorie Whitby / Chamblee Witherspoon7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSarah Milton vs Jennifer Fancher6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLeah Willett / Amy Brown vs Brooke Burris / Amanda Windmeyer4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJenny Box / Tanya Ellington vs Shannon Crocker / Heather Holt4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesShelly Little / Karla Nortier vs Kelly Dionne Moody Parker / Wendy Evins1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Cherry Dallas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Leah Willett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Mandy Folden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Sarah Milton
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.96
Jenny Box
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.92
Megan Neugebauer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Calandra Short
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.70
Joan Khilling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Tanya Ellington
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.68
Tracy Roberts
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.64
Karla Nortier
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
2.52
Shelly Little
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Jena Copeland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Waggoner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susa Digaetano
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susa Digaetano + Karla Nortier2336% games+0.4% vs expected
Mandy Folden + Jenny Box123 matchesnot enough data
Shelly Little + Tracy Roberts033 matchesnot enough data
Calandra Short + Karla Nortier123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cherry Dallas
15W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Leah Willett
10W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
Mandy Folden
11W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Sarah Milton
31W–10L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
Jenny Box
15W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
Megan Neugebauer
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Calandra Short
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joan Khilling
13W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Tanya Ellington
7W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Tracy Roberts
2W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Karla Nortier
8W–23L career · 7 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Shelly Little
3W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
2.52
Jena Copeland
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Waggoner
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susa Digaetano
6W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.