Teams

Aranda/Boles

2026 Lubbock Adult Mixed League 18 & Over · 8.0 Adult Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-07-26vs Lott/KingLost 03
L#1 DoublesChrystal Nickol Aranda / Salomon Oliveros Parra vs Raegan Boren / Trevor Paradoski6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRenee Cook / Nathanael Boles vs Gracelyn Anderson / Trenton Flores6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJennifer Moore / Logan Reeder vs Michael Flores / Kimberly Lott2-6, 0-6
2026-07-25vs McCordLost 03
L#1 DoublesLogan Reeder / Jennifer Moore vs Luciano Silveria / Angela Trevithick2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWyatt Beaugh / Camille Cruz vs Carson Bolton / Kacy Bednarz3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChristopher Gregorcyk / Chrystal Nickol Aranda vs Ty Carter / Lauren Holloway4-6, 4-6
2026-07-25vs Isom/AlvarezLost 12
L#1 DoublesChrystal Nickol Aranda / Christopher Gregorcyk vs Jack Williams / Amy Catlin3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLogan Reeder / Jennifer Moore vs Ian McDonald / Jenni Rogers6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWyatt Beaugh / Camille Cruz vs Bharat Kakarala / Amy Gandy6-2, 6-1
2026-07-16vs Lott/KingLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristopher Gregorcyk / Hannah Quick vs Hayden Farquhar / Whitney Rose Farquhar0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesChrystal Nickol Aranda / Salomon Oliveros Parra vs Dominique Ussery / Kate King6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRenee Cook / Nathanael Boles vs Tales Vieira / Mia Gonzalez3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-15vs Farris/IsomWon 10
W#1 DoublesNathanael Boles / Chrystal Nickol Aranda vs Melissa Starck / Carson Bolton7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-09vs McCordWon 21
W#1 DoublesChrystal Nickol Aranda / Salomon Oliveros Parra vs Tyler Welch / Elvira Cruz6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWyatt Beaugh / Ginger Wayland vs Robert Chon Garcia / Shaunna Jensen7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNathanael Boles / Renee Cook vs Mason Pullig / Kaily Ghilea6-2, 6-3
2026-07-08vs Farris/IsomWon 10
W#2 DoublesNathanael Boles / Mia Gonzalez vs Thomas Farris / Amy Gandy7-6, 6-2
2026-07-01vs Farris/IsomWon 20
W#1 DoublesMia Gonzalez / Nathanael Boles vs Melissa Starck / Trevor Paradoski2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChrystal Nickol Aranda / Ian McDonald vs Shannon Isom / Mel McRee6-3, 6-2
2026-06-25vs Isom/AlvarezLost 12
L#1 DoublesDain Guetersloh / Camille Cruz vs Jack Williams / Ali Hamilton0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesHannah Quick / Christopher Gregorcyk vs Mel McRee / Jenni Rogers3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSalomon Oliveros Parra / Ginger Wayland vs Bharat Kakarala / Amy Gandy6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-06-24vs Farris/IsomWon 20
W#1 DoublesJack Williams / Chrystal Nickol Aranda vs Thomas Farris / Hannah Quick6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNathanael Boles / Whitney Rose Farquhar vs Mel McRee / Shannon Isom6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0 Adult Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lott/King5111717151
2McCord3311718164
3Isom/Alvarez339921163
4Aranda/Boles1551329186

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Chrystal Nickol Aranda
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.17
Wyatt Beaugh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.03
Nathanael Boles
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.83
Paulette Sturdivant
published
3.82
Camille Cruz
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Logan Reeder
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Dain Guetersloh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Ginger Wayland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Cassie Polk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Christopher Gregorcyk
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Hannah Quick
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Renee Cook
published
Salomon Oliveros Parra
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathanael Boles + Chrystal Nickol Aranda303 matchesnot enough data
Salomon Oliveros Parra + Chrystal Nickol Aranda213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chrystal Nickol Aranda
11W–8L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
Wyatt Beaugh
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
4.17
Nathanael Boles
9W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
4.03
Paulette Sturdivant
25W–17L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Camille Cruz
16W–20L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Logan Reeder
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Dain Guetersloh
9W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Ginger Wayland
11W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Cassie Polk
26W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Christopher Gregorcyk
17W–19L career · 12 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Hannah Quick
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Renee Cook
14W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Salomon Oliveros Parra
16W–13L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.