Teams

Mitchell, ReJohnna

2026 Adult 18 & Over-JXN · Women 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-13vs Otto, JenLost 03
L#1 DoublesReJohnna Mitchell / Nyesha Nealon vs Mandalin Blanton / Ashley Stroud3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTempestt Gilmore vs Jessie Humble2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMyesha Nealon / Theresa Kennedy vs Jayme Griffin / Ellen Warren2-6, 2-6
2026-04-08vs Ramsey, NikkiLost 13
W#1 DoublesEmi Smith / Myesha Nealon vs Nikki Ramsey / Sara Jane Cole6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesNyesha Nealon vs MacKenzie Carmody1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCharmel Chatmon / Morgan Ross vs Haley Rooks / Jenny Claire Hammond Dyre6-7, 6-7
L#2 SinglesTempestt Gilmore vs Anna Miskelly0-6, 1-6
2026-04-08vs Ramsey, NikkiLost 12
L#1 DoublesNyesha Nealon / Myesha Nealon vs MacKenzie Carmody / Anna Miskelly1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesTempestt Gilmore vs Sumner Douglas2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEmi Smith / Morgan Ross vs Taylor Berry / Taylor Torrence6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-04-06vs Viljoen, EmilliaWon 31
L#1 DoublesCharmel Chatmon / Morgan Ross vs Victoria Presnall / Kayla Baucum4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesTempestt Gilmore vs Bren Gore6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEmi Smith / Nyesha Nealon vs Tina Brown / Meredith Boston6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMyesha Nealon vs Tiffany Gore6-2, 6-0
2026-03-30vs Eaton, CarrieSplit 22
W#1 DoublesEmi Smith / Morgan Ross vs Carrie Eaton / Daphne Bilbrew6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTempestt Gilmore vs Hayley Lohrisch1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNyesha Nealon / Charmel Chatmon vs Lucy Loveless / Madison Curtis2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMyesha Nealon vs Carley Fetz6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2026-03-23vs Coffey, CeliaSplit 22
L#1 DoublesReJohnna Mitchell / Nyesha Nealon vs Angie DeLeon / Michele Rumbley0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesTempestt Gilmore vs Elizabeth MacPherson6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEmi Smith / Morgan Ross vs Mary Beth Cantrell / Laurie McClintock6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRhonda Williams / Myesha Nealon vs Nancy Thompson / Susan Jackson1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-02-16vs Eaton, CarrieLost 23
W#1 DoublesEmi Smith / Rhonda Williams vs Carrie Eaton / Ashley Howell6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesTempestt Gilmore vs Lauren Mashburn6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesVonda Reeves / Morgan Ross vs Carley Fetz / Jennifer Rawson0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMyesha Nealon vs Hayley Lohrisch1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesReJohnna Mitchell / Nyesha Nealon vs Daphne Bilbrew / Misty Stricklin3-6, 1-6
2026-02-09vs Coffey, CeliaLost 14
L#1 DoublesRhonda Williams / Emi Smith vs Angie DeLeon / Michele Rumbley3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTempestt Gilmore vs Laurie McClintock7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMorgan Ross / Vonda Reeves vs Gretchen Ware / Mary Beth Cantrell0-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesNyesha Nealon vs Melissa K Beach3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMyesha Nealon / ReJohnna Mitchell vs Lauree Davis / Elizabeth MacPherson2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Myesha Nealon
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Emi Smith
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.17
Tempestt Gilmore
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #2 Singles 12% · published
3.11
ReJohnna Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Nyesha Nealon
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Charmel Chatmon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.84
Vonda Reeves
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Felicia Wheatley
published
Felisha Sheppard
published
Rhonda Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

ReJohnna Mitchell + Nyesha Nealon134 matchesnot enough data
Nyesha Nealon + Myesha Nealon044 matchesnot enough data
ReJohnna Mitchell + Vonda Reeves033 matchesnot enough data
Emi Smith + Myesha Nealon303 matchesnot enough data
Nyesha Nealon + Tempestt Gilmore303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Myesha Nealon
10W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.29
Emi Smith
14W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.23
Tempestt Gilmore
34W–15L career · 17 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.17
ReJohnna Mitchell
12W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Nyesha Nealon
8W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
3.5
Charmel Chatmon
1W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.88
Vonda Reeves
6W–32L career · 8 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.84
Felicia Wheatley
0W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Felisha Sheppard
6W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rhonda Williams
39W–42L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.