Teams

RJoplin (Queens)

2022 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-02vs JLee (Colonel Beatty)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesAmber Nee vs Jane Lee1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRenay Joplin vs Maria Santamaria1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-07-27Won 20
W#1 SinglesAmber Nee vs Catharine Haglund6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesRenay Joplin vs Kristen Titus6-2, 6-2
2022-07-26Won 10
W#2 SinglesRenay Joplin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-12vs ASunden (Raintree)Split 11
W#1 SinglesAmber Nee vs Karen Allen6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesRenay Joplin vs Katrina Richards3-6, 2-6
2022-07-06vs ERoach/SJPragasam (Queens)Won 10
W#2 SinglesRenay Joplin vs Erin Roach6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2022-06-15vs MJones (Life Time)Split 11
L#1 SinglesAmber Nee vs Anna McLaughlin3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesRenay Joplin vs Scarlet Grindle6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-08vs SBrock (Queens)Won 20
W#1 SinglesAmber Nee vs Maria Solorzano6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesRenay Joplin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-01vs JLee (Colonel Beatty)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesRenay Joplin vs Teresa Riley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Palak Merchant
published 3.5
3.36
Amber Nee
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Renay Joplin
usually #2 Singles 63%, also #3 Singles 38% · published 3
2.69
Allyson Dunlap
published 3
Karissa Chaplinsky
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amber Nee + Renay Joplin2354% gamesnot enough data
Allyson Dunlap + Amber Nee123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Palak Merchant
44W–38L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Amber Nee
108W–41L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3
Renay Joplin
69W–59L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%19%81%
3.11
3
Allyson Dunlap
8W–14L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
2.69
Karissa Chaplinsky
12W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.