Teams

LRSI-Sica/Trump 6.5 Fri am

2023 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Women 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-09-29vs LKGR-Grathwohl/RR 18Won 10
W#1 DoublesAllison Nelin / Carriann Williams vs Meredith Ortiz / Julie Whittington7-5, 7-5
2023-09-22vs LMSM-Smith/Laliberte/NMPWon 20
W#2 DoublesJennifer Plaster / Cindy Smithy vs Nell Wilson / Beth Packard3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarriann Williams / Erin Finn vs Mary Laliberte / Leslie Crane6-4, 6-3
2023-09-15vs LNMO-Monacell-Griffin/PeninsulaLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Hoglund / Alison Cooper vs Jenny Yaudes / Bonnie Zentner6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-09-08vs LWGO-Goodwin /NMP 6.5 Fri 18+Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Plaster / Allison Nelin vs Margaret Dittemore / Cathy Schmiedel6-4, 6-0
2023-08-18vs LSBE-Beardslee/WestportWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnn Baker / Sarah Hoglund vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAllison Nelin / Jennifer Plaster vs Heather Bain / Sandra Stinson6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Sarah Hoglund
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.40
Micaela Brewer
published
3.29
Carriann Williams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Jenna Germinario
published
3.20
Allison Nelin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Kimberly Sheheen
published
3.03
Kristin Brown
published
3.02
Jennifer Plaster
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Julie Modrak
published
2.86
Erin Finn
published 3
2.57
Ann Baker
published 3
Renee Sica
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Sheheen + Jennifer Plaster2343% games+3.7% vs expected
Carriann Williams + Allison Nelin3452% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Plaster + Allison Nelin5168% gamesnot enough data
Carriann Williams + Jennifer Plaster123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sarah Hoglund
94W–21L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
4.01
Micaela Brewer
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
3.40
3.5
Carriann Williams
25W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Jenna Germinario
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Allison Nelin
84W–69L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Kimberly Sheheen
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
Kristin Brown
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Jennifer Plaster
119W–119L career · 3 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
Julie Modrak
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Erin Finn
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Ann Baker
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
2.57
Renee Sica
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.