Teams

Merriss 18+ Trilevel

2024 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 2.5 - 3.0 - 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2.5 - 3.0 - 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Julia Matthews
published
3.08
Casey McKean
published 3.5
2.93
Alexis Hambrick
published 3.5
2.84
Elizabeth Lotz
published
Anne Ryan Cavin
published 3
2.65
Anna Miskel
published 3
2.61
Kristin Merriss
published
2.42
Dawn Sparks
published 3
2.41
Mary McDuffa
published
2.22
Cindy Walker
published 3
Kim Azeem
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Casey McKean + Julia Matthews26761% games+2.8% vs expected
Elizabeth Lotz + Alexis Hambrick7652% games−0.4% vs expected
Dawn Sparks + Kristin Merriss033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Matthews
40W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.20
3.5
Casey McKean
47W–17L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Alexis Hambrick
22W–17L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.93
Elizabeth Lotz
25W–15L career · no lines in 2024
0%1%99%
2.84
3
Anne Ryan Cavin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Anna Miskel
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
2.65
Kristin Merriss
19W–19L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
2.61
3
Dawn Sparks
8W–25L career · no lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
2.42
Mary McDuffa
3W–19L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.41
3
Cindy Walker
19W–30L career · no lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
2.22
Kim Azeem
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.