Teams

Yadkin/Lowman/18+4.0/Night

2023 Yadkin Valley Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women-Thursday (night)

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesMimi Cartee / Erin Huffines vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-11vs Yadkin/Tatum/18+4.0/NightWon 10
W#1 SinglesErin Huffines vs Laura Varsik4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-05-04Won 10
W#2 SinglesErin Huffines vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesKissie Stroup / Erin Huffines vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-25Lost 01
L#3 DoublesErin Huffines / Whitney Ellis vs Julie Lewis / Deanna McIlwain6-7, 3-6
2023-04-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesErin Huffines / Mimi Cartee vs Lisa Ryan / Deanna McIlwain6-4, 6-1
2023-03-30vs Yadkin/Tatum/18+4.0/NightWon 10
W#1 DoublesMimi Cartee / Erin Huffines vs Gina Goy / Kristin Williamson6-2, 6-2
2023-03-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesErin Huffines / Kimberly Bell vs Deanna McIlwain / Elizabeth Myers6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women-Thursday (night) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
3.93
Heather Parr
published
3.90
Whitney Ellis
published
3.80
Erin Huffines
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.75
Mimi Cartee
published
3.70
Lynn Guglielmo
published
3.67
Kimberly Busse
published
3.64
Jennifer Mays
published
3.43
Jocelyn Moye
published
3.21
Linda Lowman
published
Laura Buchanan
published
Nadia Gregory
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Mays + Bridget Gislimberti241159% games+10.1% vs expected
Linda Lowman + Lynn Guglielmo3248% games−1.2% vs expected
Nadia Gregory + Whitney Ellis404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bridget Gislimberti
45W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
4.07
Heather Parr
39W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
Whitney Ellis
48W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
Erin Huffines
173W–129L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
Mimi Cartee
16W–16L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Lynn Guglielmo
20W–13L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Kimberly Busse
18W–17L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
Jennifer Mays
70W–41L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.64
Jocelyn Moye
20W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
Linda Lowman
43W–44L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Laura Buchanan
9W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nadia Gregory
13W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.