Teams

Green Tree Tennis

2025 18 & OVER SPRING WEEKEND WOMEN · 4.5 Women Sunday

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-24vs Spicy SquirrelsWon 21
W#1 DoublesLinda Wooster / Pam Gandy vs Allyson McCale / Kerrie McNeel6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCourtney Mayer / Holly Perry vs Kirstin Clark / Lynn Wilson3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJessey Martinez vs Christina Li6-3, 6-0
2025-06-22vs Sailor MoonWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Alvarez / Pam Gandy vs Melinda Gonzales / Kathryn Lemons6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJessey Martinez vs Linh Nguyen6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCourtney Mayer / Holly Perry vs Paula Decas / Susan Danielson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-15vs JNCC All About SetsLost 12
W#1 DoublesCourtney Mayer / Holly Perry vs Kelsey Altgelt / Yoko Murray6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesMelody DuPerier vs Kathy Uriarte1-6
L#2 SinglesNicole Cuenca vs Mallery Bourquin1-6, 3-6
2025-06-14vs Strung for FunWon 21
L#1 DoublesCourtney Mayer / Lacey Kohnen vs Aubrey Chancellor / Joy Meltzer7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNicole Cuenca vs Ava Wood6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHolly Perry / Julie Alvarez vs Ruth Lawson / Holly Hayes2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-08vs Spicy SquirrelsLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Alvarez / Lacey Kohnen vs Milessa Jannik / Bailey Godwin7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCourtney Mayer / Holly Perry vs Catherine Herlich / Alexandria Vafadari3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Price / Linda Wooster vs Kerrie McNeel / Julie Wiernik6-3, 6-1
2025-05-04vs Sailor MoonWon 31
W#1 DoublesJulie Alvarez / Holly Perry vs Jill Rogers Fitch / MEI-JING ANG6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNicole Cuenca vs Maria Chase3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPam Gandy / Nancy Price vs Casey Sutton / Paula Decas1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLacey Kohnen / Jamie Shomette vs Kathryn Lemons / Susan Danielson6-3, 7-6
2025-04-27vs JNCC All About SetsLost 23
W#1 DoublesJulie Alvarez / Holly Perry vs Mallery Bourquin / Kelsey Altgelt6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNicole Cuenca vs Lauren Sweeney2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCourtney Mayer / Faith Hines vs MacY Valdez / Virginia Raborn6-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJessey Martinez vs Nicole Alfrey2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Price / Melody DuPerier vs Kathy Uriarte / Cindy Quigley6-2, 7-6
2025-03-30vs Strung for FunLost 13
L#1 DoublesFaith Hines / Sarah Washburne vs Ruth Lawson / Danielle Spencer1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNicole Cuenca vs Luz Danya Rivera0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCourtney Mayer / Nancy Price vs Megan Hawkins / Patricia Buchanan3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPam Gandy / Melody DuPerier vs Holly Hayes / Angelica Padilla6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.74
Julie Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.44
Lacey Kohnen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.29
Jessey Martinez
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.18
Courtney Mayer
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.14
Linda Wooster
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.05
Melody DuPerier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.02
Pam Gandy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.92
Faith Hines
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.91
Nicole Cuenca
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.80
Jamie Shomette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Alvarez + Lacey Kohnen5166% games+1.8% vs expected
Linda Wooster + Pam Gandy4647% games−8.0% vs expected
Jessey Martinez + Lacey Kohnen224 matchesnot enough data
Pam Gandy + Melody DuPerier213 matchesnot enough data
Pam Gandy + Julie Alvarez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Alvarez
22W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
4.74
Lacey Kohnen
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
4.44
Jessey Martinez
20W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Courtney Mayer
6W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
4.18
Linda Wooster
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
4.14
Melody DuPerier
6W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.05
Pam Gandy
12W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Faith Hines
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
Nicole Cuenca
2W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.91
4
Jamie Shomette
25W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.