Teams

Ivan

2022 Montgomery Adult 55 & Over Spring · Montgomery Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.79 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-26vs AcesbacktobackWon 10
W#2 DoublesSteven Dunne / Dennis Weikel vs Dean Burch / Alan Klein6-1, 6-1
2022-06-18vs AcesbacktobackLost 01
L#3 DoublesIvan Teelucksingh / Dennis Weikel vs Dean Burch / Henry Forster2-6, 3-6
2022-06-09vs AcesbacktobackWon 10
W#1 DoublesJonathan Ferrell / Mark Matsko vs Bryan Kay / Mark Lichtenstein7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2022-05-31Won 10
W#3 DoublesJonathan Ferrell / Daniel Lawson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-25vs AcesbacktobackWon 10
W#3 DoublesIvan Teelucksingh / Jonathan Ferrell vs Alan Klein / Geoffrey Montgomery4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-05-22vs AcesbacktobackLost 01
L#3 DoublesTimothy Triplett / Dennis Weikel vs Bill Devine / Michael Kane3-6, 5-7
2022-05-17vs AcesbacktobackLost 01
L#2 DoublesJonathan Ferrell / Steven Dunne vs Mark Lichtenstein / Richard Boothe2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Florian Kogelnik
published 4.5
3.81
Mark Matsko
published
Daniel Lawson
published 4
3.58
Dennis Weikel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.57
Igor Chechik
published 4
3.44
Gerald McClellan
published 3.5
3.40
Jonathan Ferrell
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
John Payne
published
Larry Johnson
published
Steven Dunne
published
Timothy Triplett
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Florian Kogelnik
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Matsko
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Daniel Lawson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Dennis Weikel
147W–171L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.58
4
Igor Chechik
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Gerald McClellan
12W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
4
Jonathan Ferrell
101W–197L career · 7 lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.40
3
Ivan Teelucksingh
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John Payne
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Larry Johnson
24W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Dunne
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Timothy Triplett
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.