Teams

Maggin

2022 Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Winter · Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Winter 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-15vs Love HurtsWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeanne Pim / Keelin Gallagher vs Margaret Brown / Lisa Means6-1, 7-6
2022-03-10vs KorolkoffLost 01
L#1 DoublesKeelin Gallagher / Lisa Rudden vs Alexa Whiteside / Dawn Forsberg2-6, 0-6
2022-02-25vs PortoWon 10
W#1 DoublesKeelin Gallagher / Allison Papadopoulos vs Meredith Berlin / Elana Steinberg7-6, 6-2
2022-02-14vs Love AllWon 10
W#2 DoublesKeelin Gallagher / JEAN HARVEY vs Kay Han / Jennifer Beebe6-1, 6-1
2022-02-11vs LarsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Rudden / Keelin Gallagher vs Norma Mendelson / Kim Purring6-1, 7-5
2022-01-25vs PortoWon 10
W#1 DoublesAllison Papadopoulos / Keelin Gallagher vs Allison Fulton / Anne Porto6-2, 6-2
2022-01-19vs Block/CopelandLost 01
L#1 DoublesKeelin Gallagher / Allison Papadopoulos vs Patricia Block / Ann Bent6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-01-13vs Love HurtsLost 01
L#1 DoublesCameron Caskin / Keelin Gallagher vs Beth Kiesner / Audrey Zeidan6-0, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Winter 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
JEAN HARVEY
published 4
3.73
Keelin Gallagher
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Laurie Stien
published
3.60
Kary Magruder
published
3.55
Lori Clogg
published
Cameron Caskin
published 3.5
Donna Harris
published
Lisa Rudden
published
Nancy Eisner
published
Rebecca Sirody
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Clogg + Kary Magruder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Papadopoulos
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
JEAN HARVEY
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Keelin Gallagher
77W–25L career · 8 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Laurie Stien
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Kary Magruder
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Lori Clogg
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Cameron Caskin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Donna Harris
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Rudden
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Eisner
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rebecca Sirody
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.